File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel

TitlePhotographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel
Authors
KeywordsDevelopmental effects
Enamel defects
Photographic assessments
Issue Date2005
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
Citation
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2005, v. 33 n. 6, p. 438-446 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of photographic examinations for developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in maxillary and mandibular incisors and canines using a standardized process. Methods: The anterior teeth of 257 children were examined 'wet', both clinically and photographically for DDE, using the modified Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) (DDE) Index. A series of five standardized photographs were taken for each child: a frontal view perpendicular to the four incisors; two lateral views, each showing the lateral incisors and canines on each side of the dental arch; and the superior and inferior views, retaking of the frontal view with the camera held at approximately 30°above and below the horizontal plane. The photographs taken for each child were viewed as three different sets; the 'five-view' (frontal, two lateral views plus superior and inferior views), 'three-view' (frontal and two lateral views), and 'one-view' (frontal view only) slide sets. Results: Using 'one view' slides, 91.7% of teeth could be examined photographically. Whereas using multiple views 99.9% of teeth could be assessed. At the subject level, agreements between clinical diagnoses (gold standard) and photographic examinations were substantial to almost perfect (k = 0.73-0.86). At the tooth level, agreement was best for incisors (k = 0.71 or higher). The intra-examiner reproducibility was high for the photographic assessments at both subject and tooth levels (k = 0.71-0.95). Conclusions: Multiple-view photographic slides of 'five-view' and 'three-view' are valid and reliable for assessing DDE on the 12 anterior teeth, while a 'one-view' (frontal) was acceptable to study only the incisors. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/65895
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.233
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, HMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLo, ECen_HK
dc.contributor.authorKing, NMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:41:53Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:41:53Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2005, v. 33 n. 6, p. 438-446en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/65895-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of photographic examinations for developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in maxillary and mandibular incisors and canines using a standardized process. Methods: The anterior teeth of 257 children were examined 'wet', both clinically and photographically for DDE, using the modified Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) (DDE) Index. A series of five standardized photographs were taken for each child: a frontal view perpendicular to the four incisors; two lateral views, each showing the lateral incisors and canines on each side of the dental arch; and the superior and inferior views, retaking of the frontal view with the camera held at approximately 30°above and below the horizontal plane. The photographs taken for each child were viewed as three different sets; the 'five-view' (frontal, two lateral views plus superior and inferior views), 'three-view' (frontal and two lateral views), and 'one-view' (frontal view only) slide sets. Results: Using 'one view' slides, 91.7% of teeth could be examined photographically. Whereas using multiple views 99.9% of teeth could be assessed. At the subject level, agreements between clinical diagnoses (gold standard) and photographic examinations were substantial to almost perfect (k = 0.73-0.86). At the tooth level, agreement was best for incisors (k = 0.71 or higher). The intra-examiner reproducibility was high for the photographic assessments at both subject and tooth levels (k = 0.71-0.95). Conclusions: Multiple-view photographic slides of 'five-view' and 'three-view' are valid and reliable for assessing DDE on the 12 anterior teeth, while a 'one-view' (frontal) was acceptable to study only the incisors. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COMen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_HK
dc.subjectDevelopmental effectsen_HK
dc.subjectEnamel defectsen_HK
dc.subjectPhotographic assessmentsen_HK
dc.subject.meshChilden_HK
dc.subject.meshCuspid - pathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamel - abnormalitiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamel Hypoplasia - diagnosis - pathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Recordsen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshIncisor - pathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhotography, Dentalen_HK
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen_HK
dc.titlePhotographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamelen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0301-5661&volume=33&spage=438&epage=446&date=2005&atitle=Photographs+as+a+means+of+assessing+developmental+defects+of+enamelen_HK
dc.identifier.emailWong, HM: wonghmg@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C: mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLo, EC: hrdplcm@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailKing, NM: hhdbknm@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, HM=rp00042en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLo, EC=rp00015en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityKing, NM=rp00006en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00245.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid16262611-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33644667388en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros114239en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33644667388&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume33en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage438en_HK
dc.identifier.epage446en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000232849700006-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, HM=12765604700en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLo, EC=7101705982en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKing, NM=7201762850en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats