File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Raising: Dutch between English and German
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleRaising: Dutch between English and German
 
AuthorsVan Der Auwera, J2
Noël, D1
 
KeywordsGermanic philology
 
Issue Date2011
 
PublisherCambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JGL
 
CitationJournal Of Germanic Linguistics, 2011, v. 23 n. 1, p. 1-36 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1470542710000048
 
AbstractAs a complement to C. B. van Haeringen's classic comparative study (1956) that positioned the grammar of Dutch in between the grammars of English and German, this study compares the productivity of three kinds of "raising" patterns in these languages: Object-to-Subject, Subject-to-Object, and Subject-to-Subject raising. It establishes the extent to which Dutch, as well as English and German, have evolved from the old West Germanic starting point these languages are assumed to have shared in this area of grammar. The results are a test case for Hawkins' (1986) case syncretism account of the difference in "explicit-ness" between the grammars of English and German. © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2011.
 
ISSN1470-5427
2013 Impact Factor: 0.571
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1470542710000048
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000287968100001
 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Auwera, J
 
dc.contributor.authorNoël, D
 
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:39:43Z
 
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:39:43Z
 
dc.date.issued2011
 
dc.description.abstractAs a complement to C. B. van Haeringen's classic comparative study (1956) that positioned the grammar of Dutch in between the grammars of English and German, this study compares the productivity of three kinds of "raising" patterns in these languages: Object-to-Subject, Subject-to-Object, and Subject-to-Subject raising. It establishes the extent to which Dutch, as well as English and German, have evolved from the old West Germanic starting point these languages are assumed to have shared in this area of grammar. The results are a test case for Hawkins' (1986) case syncretism account of the difference in "explicit-ness" between the grammars of English and German. © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2011.
 
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version
 
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Germanic Linguistics, 2011, v. 23 n. 1, p. 1-36 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1470542710000048
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1470542710000048
 
dc.identifier.eissn1475-3014
 
dc.identifier.epage36
 
dc.identifier.hkuros183828
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287968100001
 
dc.identifier.issn1470-5427
2013 Impact Factor: 0.571
 
dc.identifier.issue1
 
dc.identifier.openurl
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-80755189599
 
dc.identifier.spage1
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/65651
 
dc.identifier.volume23
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherCambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JGL
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
 
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Germanic Linguistics
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License
 
dc.subjectGermanic philology
 
dc.titleRaising: Dutch between English and German
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Van Der Auwera, J</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>No&#235;l, D</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2010-09-06T05:39:43Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2010-09-06T05:39:43Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2011</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Journal Of Germanic Linguistics, 2011, v. 23 n. 1, p. 1-36</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>1470-5427</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/65651</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>As a complement to C. B. van Haeringen&apos;s classic comparative study (1956) that positioned the grammar of Dutch in between the grammars of English and German, this study compares the productivity of three kinds of &quot;raising&quot; patterns in these languages: Object-to-Subject, Subject-to-Object, and Subject-to-Subject raising. It establishes the extent to which Dutch, as well as English and German, have evolved from the old West Germanic starting point these languages are assumed to have shared in this area of grammar. The results are a test case for Hawkins&apos; (1986) case syncretism account of the difference in &quot;explicit-ness&quot; between the grammars of English and German. &#169; Society for Germanic Linguistics 2011.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JGL</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Journal of Germanic Linguistics</relation.ispartof>
<rights>Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License</rights>
<subject>Germanic philology</subject>
<title>Raising: Dutch between English and German</title>
<type>Article</type>
<identifier.openurl>http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&amp;issn=1470-5427&amp;volume=23&amp;spage=1&amp;epage=36&amp;date=2010&amp;atitle=Raising:+Dutch+between+English+and+German</identifier.openurl>
<description.nature>published_or_final_version</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1017/S1470542710000048</identifier.doi>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-80755189599</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>183828</identifier.hkuros>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80755189599&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>23</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>1</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>1</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>36</identifier.epage>
<identifier.eissn>1475-3014</identifier.eissn>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000287968100001</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United Kingdom</publisher.place>
<bitstream.url>http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/65651/1/content.pdf</bitstream.url>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. The University of Hong Kong
  2. Universiteit Antwerpen