File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie.

TitleGezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie.
Other Titles[Dutch gezegd worden (‘be said to’) + te-infinitive: an archaic evidential construction.]
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherMaatschappij der Nederlandse letterkunde.
Citation
Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkunde, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 How to Cite?
Journal for Dutch Language and Literature, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 How to Cite?
AbstractIn present-day Dutch, unlike in English, the lexical possibilities of the so-called nominative and infinitive pattern are limited to a handful of verbs, viz. achten 'consider', veronderstellen 'suppose' and verwachten 'expect'. On the basis of a diachronic survey of linguistic data culled from the textual corpus of De Gids (founded im 1837), the present paper shows that in nineteenth-century Dutch, by contrast, the nominative and infinitive construction was also frequently used with zeggen 'say', though the use of this verb in the corresponding accusative and infinitive pattern was already nearly obsolete at that time. We argue that the rate of occurrence of gezegd worden + te-infinitive in nineteenth-century Dutch was at least partly due to its potential for being used as an evidential 'hearsay' marker.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/65638
ISSN
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.111

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColleman, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorNoël, Den_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:39:37Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:39:37Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_HK
dc.identifier.citationTijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkunde, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal for Dutch Language and Literature, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403-
dc.identifier.issn0040-7550-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/65638-
dc.description.abstractIn present-day Dutch, unlike in English, the lexical possibilities of the so-called nominative and infinitive pattern are limited to a handful of verbs, viz. achten 'consider', veronderstellen 'suppose' and verwachten 'expect'. On the basis of a diachronic survey of linguistic data culled from the textual corpus of De Gids (founded im 1837), the present paper shows that in nineteenth-century Dutch, by contrast, the nominative and infinitive construction was also frequently used with zeggen 'say', though the use of this verb in the corresponding accusative and infinitive pattern was already nearly obsolete at that time. We argue that the rate of occurrence of gezegd worden + te-infinitive in nineteenth-century Dutch was at least partly due to its potential for being used as an evidential 'hearsay' marker.-
dc.languageduten_HK
dc.publisherMaatschappij der Nederlandse letterkunde.en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofTijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkundeen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal for Dutch Language and Literature-
dc.titleGezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie.en_HK
dc.title.alternative[Dutch gezegd worden (‘be said to’) + te-infinitive: an archaic evidential construction.]-
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailNoel, D: dnoel@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityNoël, D=rp01170en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77950887627-
dc.identifier.hkuros157432en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats