File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Gezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie.
Title | Gezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie. |
---|---|
Other Titles | [Dutch gezegd worden (‘be said to’) + te-infinitive: an archaic evidential construction.] |
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Maatschappij der Nederlandse letterkunde. |
Citation | Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkunde, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 How to Cite? Journal for Dutch Language and Literature, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In present-day Dutch, unlike in English, the lexical possibilities of the so-called nominative and infinitive pattern are limited to a handful of verbs, viz. achten 'consider', veronderstellen 'suppose' and verwachten 'expect'. On the basis of a diachronic survey of linguistic data culled from the textual corpus of De Gids (founded im 1837), the present paper shows that in nineteenth-century Dutch, by contrast, the nominative and infinitive construction was also frequently used with zeggen 'say', though the use of this verb in the corresponding accusative and infinitive pattern was already nearly obsolete at that time. We argue that the rate of occurrence of gezegd worden + te-infinitive in nineteenth-century Dutch was at least partly due to its potential for being used as an evidential 'hearsay' marker. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/65638 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.140 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Colleman, T | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Noël, D | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T05:39:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T05:39:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkunde, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal for Dutch Language and Literature, 2009, v. 125, p. 385-403 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0040-7550 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/65638 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In present-day Dutch, unlike in English, the lexical possibilities of the so-called nominative and infinitive pattern are limited to a handful of verbs, viz. achten 'consider', veronderstellen 'suppose' and verwachten 'expect'. On the basis of a diachronic survey of linguistic data culled from the textual corpus of De Gids (founded im 1837), the present paper shows that in nineteenth-century Dutch, by contrast, the nominative and infinitive construction was also frequently used with zeggen 'say', though the use of this verb in the corresponding accusative and infinitive pattern was already nearly obsolete at that time. We argue that the rate of occurrence of gezegd worden + te-infinitive in nineteenth-century Dutch was at least partly due to its potential for being used as an evidential 'hearsay' marker. | - |
dc.language | dut | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Maatschappij der Nederlandse letterkunde. | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal en Letterkunde | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal for Dutch Language and Literature | - |
dc.title | Gezegd worden + te-infinitief: een verouderde evidentiele constructie. | en_HK |
dc.title.alternative | [Dutch gezegd worden (‘be said to’) + te-infinitive: an archaic evidential construction.] | - |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Noel, D: dnoel@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Noël, D=rp01170 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77950887627 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 157432 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0040-7550 | - |