File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Gender Differences in Information Technology Acceptance

TitleGender Differences in Information Technology Acceptance
Authors
Issue Date2008
PublisherIGI Global.
Citation
Gender Differences in Information Technology Acceptance. In Ang, CS, Zaphiris, P (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (4 Volumes), p. 2287-2295. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2008 How to Cite?
AbstractGender differences in computer use has been always a topic of research interest. The understanding of the patterns among gender, including beliefs, intention and use behavior of IT/IS would provide us a better picture to the process of design and implementation, which gives support to IT/IS success. However, published works explaining why and how beliefs and attitudes varied between different genders are still scarce, yet the topic was of widespread relevance. We direct our empirical work on user’s beliefs, intention and usage behavior. Gender differences in beliefs would likely make a corresponding impact on the intention to use or not to use computer in the future, and hence, the actual usage pattern. Assumed to be behavioral manifestations of users’ gender differences, we infer these gender differences in the beliefs of computer use from their self-reported intention and usage behavior. Therefore, we aim to explore the factors affecting the intention and usage behavior; and their corresponding strengths in affecting the intention and usage behavior; in order to suggest effective implementation strategies accordingly. The research questions of this empirical study are: 1. What are the emergent constructs that drive the intention and usage behavior of computer use? 2. Do users’ beliefs regarding IT/IS usage differ among genders? 3. To what extent do these effects differ? To address these research questions, we applied technology acceptance model (TAM) to a group of pre-service teachers, and measured their beliefs in using computer to explain the gender differences in their beliefs, intention, and usage of computer. The rest of the article proceeds as follows. The next section starts with a review on gender and technology. The third section explains the model framework TAM. The fourth section describes the instrument construction and validation. The fifth section reports the model testing results. The final section discusses the thrusts of the study and future trends.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/64748
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMa, WWKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, HKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-13T05:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-13T05:00:00Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationGender Differences in Information Technology Acceptance. In Ang, CS, Zaphiris, P (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (4 Volumes), p. 2287-2295. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2008en_HK
dc.identifier.isbn9781605660523-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/64748-
dc.description.abstractGender differences in computer use has been always a topic of research interest. The understanding of the patterns among gender, including beliefs, intention and use behavior of IT/IS would provide us a better picture to the process of design and implementation, which gives support to IT/IS success. However, published works explaining why and how beliefs and attitudes varied between different genders are still scarce, yet the topic was of widespread relevance. We direct our empirical work on user’s beliefs, intention and usage behavior. Gender differences in beliefs would likely make a corresponding impact on the intention to use or not to use computer in the future, and hence, the actual usage pattern. Assumed to be behavioral manifestations of users’ gender differences, we infer these gender differences in the beliefs of computer use from their self-reported intention and usage behavior. Therefore, we aim to explore the factors affecting the intention and usage behavior; and their corresponding strengths in affecting the intention and usage behavior; in order to suggest effective implementation strategies accordingly. The research questions of this empirical study are: 1. What are the emergent constructs that drive the intention and usage behavior of computer use? 2. Do users’ beliefs regarding IT/IS usage differ among genders? 3. To what extent do these effects differ? To address these research questions, we applied technology acceptance model (TAM) to a group of pre-service teachers, and measured their beliefs in using computer to explain the gender differences in their beliefs, intention, and usage of computer. The rest of the article proceeds as follows. The next section starts with a review on gender and technology. The third section explains the model framework TAM. The fourth section describes the instrument construction and validation. The fifth section reports the model testing results. The final section discusses the thrusts of the study and future trends.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherIGI Global.en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (4 Volumes)-
dc.titleGender Differences in Information Technology Acceptanceen_HK
dc.typeBook_Chapteren_HK
dc.identifier.emailMa, WWK: willma@graduate.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailYuen, HK: hkyuen@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYuen, HK=rp00983en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/978-1-87828-991-9.ch151-
dc.identifier.hkuros159565en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats