Article: Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleAnalogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes
AuthorsLam, WK1
Maxwell, JP1
Masters, RSW1
KeywordsAttention
Implicit motor learning
Instruction
Movement components
Working memory
Issue Date2009
PublisherTaylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02640414.asp
CitationJournal Of Sports Sciences, 2009, v. 27 n. 2, p. 179-191 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
AbstractThe effects of differential instructional sets on motor skill acquisition were investigated using performance outcome and kinematic measures. Participants were provided with a single analogical instruction (analogy learning), a set of eight explicit (technical) instructions (explicit learning), or were not instructed (control). During a learning phase, participants (n = 9 for each condition) performed a modified basketball shooting task over 3 days (160 trials per day). On the fourth day, participants performed a test phase consisting of two 40-trial retention tests, separated by a 40-trial secondary task transfer test, and completed a verbal protocol describing in detail the techniques that they had used to perform the task. No performance differences were found during the two retention tests, indicating similar amounts of learning for all groups. During the transfer test, performance deteriorated for both the explicit and control conditions, but not for the analogy condition. Participants in the analogy condition reported significantly fewer technical rules. Although no group differences were reported for kinematic variables, identification of movement components supported the claim that explicit learners exert conscious control over their movements, whereas analogy learners use a more implicit (unconscious or automatic) mode of movement control.
ISSN0264-0414
2011 Impact Factor: 1.931
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.077
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000262513900010
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Competitive Earmarked Research GrantHKU 7231/04H
Hong Kong Research Grants Council
Funding Information:

This research was supported by a Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (HKU 7231/04H) awarded to the second and third authors by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council.

ReferencesReferences in Scopus
GrantsInstruction, errorless learning and rehabilitation: Taking the spanner out of the works?
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorLam, WK
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, JP
dc.contributor.authorMasters, RSW
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T04:12:03Z
dc.date.available2010-05-31T04:12:03Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThe effects of differential instructional sets on motor skill acquisition were investigated using performance outcome and kinematic measures. Participants were provided with a single analogical instruction (analogy learning), a set of eight explicit (technical) instructions (explicit learning), or were not instructed (control). During a learning phase, participants (n = 9 for each condition) performed a modified basketball shooting task over 3 days (160 trials per day). On the fourth day, participants performed a test phase consisting of two 40-trial retention tests, separated by a 40-trial secondary task transfer test, and completed a verbal protocol describing in detail the techniques that they had used to perform the task. No performance differences were found during the two retention tests, indicating similar amounts of learning for all groups. During the transfer test, performance deteriorated for both the explicit and control conditions, but not for the analogy condition. Participants in the analogy condition reported significantly fewer technical rules. Although no group differences were reported for kinematic variables, identification of movement components supported the claim that explicit learners exert conscious control over their movements, whereas analogy learners use a more implicit (unconscious or automatic) mode of movement control.
dc.description.grantInstruction, errorless learning and rehabilitation: Taking the spanner out of the works?
dc.description.grantcode18537
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Sports Sciences, 2009, v. 27 n. 2, p. 179-191 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
dc.identifier.epage191
dc.identifier.hkuros154511
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000262513900010
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Competitive Earmarked Research GrantHKU 7231/04H
Hong Kong Research Grants Council
Funding Information:

This research was supported by a Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (HKU 7231/04H) awarded to the second and third authors by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council.

dc.identifier.issn0264-0414
2011 Impact Factor: 1.931
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.077
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.pmid19153868
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-58949090646
dc.identifier.spage179
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/60495
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02640414.asp
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sports Sciences
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.subjectAttention
dc.subjectImplicit motor learning
dc.subjectInstruction
dc.subjectMovement components
dc.subjectWorking memory
dc.titleAnalogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. The University of Hong Kong