Article: Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes
| Title | Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Lam, WK1 Maxwell, JP1 Masters, RSW1 | ||||||
| Keywords | Attention Implicit motor learning Instruction Movement components Working memory | ||||||
| Issue Date | 2009 | ||||||
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02640414.asp | ||||||
| Citation | Journal Of Sports Sciences, 2009, v. 27 n. 2, p. 179-191 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764 | ||||||
| Abstract | The effects of differential instructional sets on motor skill acquisition were investigated using performance outcome and kinematic measures. Participants were provided with a single analogical instruction (analogy learning), a set of eight explicit (technical) instructions (explicit learning), or were not instructed (control). During a learning phase, participants (n = 9 for each condition) performed a modified basketball shooting task over 3 days (160 trials per day). On the fourth day, participants performed a test phase consisting of two 40-trial retention tests, separated by a 40-trial secondary task transfer test, and completed a verbal protocol describing in detail the techniques that they had used to perform the task. No performance differences were found during the two retention tests, indicating similar amounts of learning for all groups. During the transfer test, performance deteriorated for both the explicit and control conditions, but not for the analogy condition. Participants in the analogy condition reported significantly fewer technical rules. Although no group differences were reported for kinematic variables, identification of movement components supported the claim that explicit learners exert conscious control over their movements, whereas analogy learners use a more implicit (unconscious or automatic) mode of movement control. | ||||||
| ISSN | 0264-0414 2011 Impact Factor: 1.931 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.077 | ||||||
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764 | ||||||
| ISI Accession Number ID | WOS:000262513900010
Funding Information: This research was supported by a Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (HKU 7231/04H) awarded to the second and third authors by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council. | ||||||
| References | References in Scopus | ||||||
| Grants | Instruction, errorless learning and rehabilitation: Taking the spanner out of the works? |
| dc.contributor.author | Lam, WK | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Maxwell, JP | ||||||
| dc.contributor.author | Masters, RSW | ||||||
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-31T04:12:03Z | ||||||
| dc.date.available | 2010-05-31T04:12:03Z | ||||||
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | ||||||
| dc.description.abstract | The effects of differential instructional sets on motor skill acquisition were investigated using performance outcome and kinematic measures. Participants were provided with a single analogical instruction (analogy learning), a set of eight explicit (technical) instructions (explicit learning), or were not instructed (control). During a learning phase, participants (n = 9 for each condition) performed a modified basketball shooting task over 3 days (160 trials per day). On the fourth day, participants performed a test phase consisting of two 40-trial retention tests, separated by a 40-trial secondary task transfer test, and completed a verbal protocol describing in detail the techniques that they had used to perform the task. No performance differences were found during the two retention tests, indicating similar amounts of learning for all groups. During the transfer test, performance deteriorated for both the explicit and control conditions, but not for the analogy condition. Participants in the analogy condition reported significantly fewer technical rules. Although no group differences were reported for kinematic variables, identification of movement components supported the claim that explicit learners exert conscious control over their movements, whereas analogy learners use a more implicit (unconscious or automatic) mode of movement control. | ||||||
| dc.description.grant | Instruction, errorless learning and rehabilitation: Taking the spanner out of the works? | ||||||
| dc.description.grantcode | 18537 | ||||||
| dc.description.nature | Link_to_subscribed_fulltext | ||||||
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Sports Sciences, 2009, v. 27 n. 2, p. 179-191 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.epage | 191 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 154511 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000262513900010
Funding Information: This research was supported by a Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (HKU 7231/04H) awarded to the second and third authors by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council. | ||||||
| dc.identifier.issn | 0264-0414 2011 Impact Factor: 1.931 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.077 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.openurl | ![]() | ||||||
| dc.identifier.pmid | 19153868 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-58949090646 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.spage | 179 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/60495 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | ||||||
| dc.language | eng | ||||||
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02640414.asp | ||||||
| dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | ||||||
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Sports Sciences | ||||||
| dc.relation.references | References in Scopus | ||||||
| dc.subject | Attention | ||||||
| dc.subject | Implicit motor learning | ||||||
| dc.subject | Instruction | ||||||
| dc.subject | Movement components | ||||||
| dc.subject | Working memory | ||||||
| dc.title | Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes | ||||||
| dc.type | Article |
Author Affiliations
- The University of Hong Kong


