File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Supporting medical decision making with argumentation tools

TitleSupporting medical decision making with argumentation tools
Authors
KeywordsArgumentation
Argumentation tools
Cognitive tools
Collaborative learning
Computer-supported collaborative learning
Discourse analysis
Medical decision-making
Problem solving
Issue Date2008
PublisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cedpsych
Citation
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2008, v. 33 n. 3, p. 425-442 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study investigated the collaborative decision-making and communicative discourse of groups of learners engaged in a simulated medical emergency in two conditions. In one condition subgroups used a traditional whiteboard (TW group) to document medical arguments on how to solve a medical emergency. In the other condition subgroups used interactive whiteboards (IW group) where they could document their medical arguments by using a structured template for constructing, annotating and sharing arguments. The discourse of each group was coded with respect to decision-making and communicative activities. The research goal was to identify relationships between the decision-making and collaborative discourse under the two conditions. The IW condition differed from the TW condition in that participants engaged in more adaptive decision-making behavior early on in the intervention. This early engagement led to shared understandings and subsequently to more effective patient management. Group differences were also found in the types of collaborative discourse and the IW groups produced more productive argumentation. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/60064
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.492
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.426
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLajoie, SPen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T04:03:01Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-31T04:03:01Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Educational Psychology, 2008, v. 33 n. 3, p. 425-442en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0361-476Xen_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/60064-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the collaborative decision-making and communicative discourse of groups of learners engaged in a simulated medical emergency in two conditions. In one condition subgroups used a traditional whiteboard (TW group) to document medical arguments on how to solve a medical emergency. In the other condition subgroups used interactive whiteboards (IW group) where they could document their medical arguments by using a structured template for constructing, annotating and sharing arguments. The discourse of each group was coded with respect to decision-making and communicative activities. The research goal was to identify relationships between the decision-making and collaborative discourse under the two conditions. The IW condition differed from the TW condition in that participants engaged in more adaptive decision-making behavior early on in the intervention. This early engagement led to shared understandings and subsequently to more effective patient management. Group differences were also found in the types of collaborative discourse and the IW groups produced more productive argumentation. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cedpsychen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofContemporary Educational Psychologyen_HK
dc.subjectArgumentationen_HK
dc.subjectArgumentation toolsen_HK
dc.subjectCognitive toolsen_HK
dc.subjectCollaborative learningen_HK
dc.subjectComputer-supported collaborative learningen_HK
dc.subjectDiscourse analysisen_HK
dc.subjectMedical decision-makingen_HK
dc.subjectProblem solvingen_HK
dc.titleSupporting medical decision making with argumentation toolsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0361-476X&volume=33&issue=3&spage=425&epage=442&date=2008&atitle=Supporting+medical+decision+making+with+argumentation+toolsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLu, J: jingyan@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLu, J=rp00930en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.005en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-48349103021en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros150994en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-48349103021&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume33en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3en_HK
dc.identifier.spage425en_HK
dc.identifier.epage442en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1090-2384-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000258707200005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLu, J=24399629600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLajoie, SP=6602435220en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats