File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/17540290802227585
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-74849097452
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The culture of revenge and the power of politics: A comparative attempt to explain the punitive
Title | The culture of revenge and the power of politics: A comparative attempt to explain the punitive |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Culture Power Punishment Punitive norms Social attitudes |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Citation | Journal Of Political Power, 2008, v. 1 n. 2, p. 169-187 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In this article, it is argued that punitive attitudes or 'norms of harshness' are more plausibly linked to various degrees of power than they are to culture. The People's Republic of China today executes several times more people than the rest of the world combined. It has become somewhat of a truism in China, and accepted outside, that this is due to special Chinese cultural conditions. However, upon close scrutiny, the arguments for this hypothesis are found wanting. In the final instance, it is not culture but political power that dominates the Chinese affinity towards harshness. Punitive norms tend to be fairly short-term and changeable, which goes against the idea of 'deeply rooted retributive culture'. The so-called 'national conditions of revenge' is frequently manipulated, as is shown by survey data proving the alleged 'people's revenge' to have stronger elite than popular support. Harshness has simply become a norm of political elites. Punitive culture should be seen against a background of a changeable repertoire of possibilities. It is the power of politics, not the inertia of revengeful culture that holds back the modernization of Chinese penal sentiments, attitudes, and - hopefully - practices. © 2008 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59836 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.898 |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bakken, B | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-31T03:58:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-31T03:58:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Political Power, 2008, v. 1 n. 2, p. 169-187 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 2158-379X | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59836 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, it is argued that punitive attitudes or 'norms of harshness' are more plausibly linked to various degrees of power than they are to culture. The People's Republic of China today executes several times more people than the rest of the world combined. It has become somewhat of a truism in China, and accepted outside, that this is due to special Chinese cultural conditions. However, upon close scrutiny, the arguments for this hypothesis are found wanting. In the final instance, it is not culture but political power that dominates the Chinese affinity towards harshness. Punitive norms tend to be fairly short-term and changeable, which goes against the idea of 'deeply rooted retributive culture'. The so-called 'national conditions of revenge' is frequently manipulated, as is shown by survey data proving the alleged 'people's revenge' to have stronger elite than popular support. Harshness has simply become a norm of political elites. Punitive culture should be seen against a background of a changeable repertoire of possibilities. It is the power of politics, not the inertia of revengeful culture that holds back the modernization of Chinese penal sentiments, attitudes, and - hopefully - practices. © 2008 Taylor & Francis. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Political Power | en_HK |
dc.subject | Culture | en_HK |
dc.subject | Power | en_HK |
dc.subject | Punishment | en_HK |
dc.subject | Punitive norms | en_HK |
dc.subject | Social attitudes | en_HK |
dc.title | The culture of revenge and the power of politics: A comparative attempt to explain the punitive | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Bakken, B: bakken@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Bakken, B=rp00616 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17540290802227585 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-74849097452 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 150431 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-74849097452&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 169 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 187 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bakken, B=6603543706 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2158-379X | - |