File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The International Judge in an age of multiple courts and tribunals

TitleThe International Judge in an age of multiple courts and tribunals
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherThe University of Chicago Law School.
Citation
Chicago Journal of International Law, 2009, v. 9 n. 2, p. 407-470 How to Cite?
AbstractThis Article focuses on two phenomena that have emerged, and are likely to continue to emerge, from the growth of international courts and tribunals. These phenomena are the engagement of multiple institutions in resolving a particular dispute, and the risk of inconsistency, even conflict, in the jurisprudence of such institutions. We concentrate on several examples, but do not pretend that these are the only examples that international practice can furnish. Nevertheless, they are particularly useful for helping us chart a way forward. To be acceptable and workable, any such exercise must be grounded in the reality of the international legal order and consistent with the fundamental principles and doctrines of international law. Section II presents a conceptual examination of the situation and studies the implications of the expanding world of international courts and tribunals. Section III deals with multiple institution engagement and competing jurisdictions, while Section IV deals with conflicting jurisprudence. Both Sections III and IV are rooted in case studies. Section V concludes the discussion, with Section VI synthesizing the earlier analysis and drawing from relevant practices in both international and domestic systems to develop guidelines to assist the international judge.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58897
ISSN
2005 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.103

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLinton, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTiba, FKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T03:39:11Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-31T03:39:11Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_HK
dc.identifier.citationChicago Journal of International Law, 2009, v. 9 n. 2, p. 407-470en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1529-0816-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58897-
dc.description.abstractThis Article focuses on two phenomena that have emerged, and are likely to continue to emerge, from the growth of international courts and tribunals. These phenomena are the engagement of multiple institutions in resolving a particular dispute, and the risk of inconsistency, even conflict, in the jurisprudence of such institutions. We concentrate on several examples, but do not pretend that these are the only examples that international practice can furnish. Nevertheless, they are particularly useful for helping us chart a way forward. To be acceptable and workable, any such exercise must be grounded in the reality of the international legal order and consistent with the fundamental principles and doctrines of international law. Section II presents a conceptual examination of the situation and studies the implications of the expanding world of international courts and tribunals. Section III deals with multiple institution engagement and competing jurisdictions, while Section IV deals with conflicting jurisprudence. Both Sections III and IV are rooted in case studies. Section V concludes the discussion, with Section VI synthesizing the earlier analysis and drawing from relevant practices in both international and domestic systems to develop guidelines to assist the international judge.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Law School.-
dc.relation.ispartofChicago Journal of International Lawen_HK
dc.titleThe International Judge in an age of multiple courts and tribunalsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLinton, S: suzannah@HKUCC.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailTiba, FK: tiba@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLinton, S=rp01263en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros156731en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats