File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1109/JLT.2008.2005552
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-68349157355
- WOS: WOS:000268347700005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Minimum delay scheduling for performance guaranteed switches with optical fabrics
Title | Minimum delay scheduling for performance guaranteed switches with optical fabrics |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Optical switch Performance guaranteed switching Reconfiguration overhead Scheduling Speedup |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | I E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=50 |
Citation | Journal Of Lightwave Technology, 2009, v. 27 n. 16, p. 3453-3465 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We consider traffic scheduling in performance guaranteed switches with optical fabrics to ensure 100% throughput and bounded packet delay. Each switch reconfiguration consumes a constant period of time called reconfiguration overhead, during which no packet can be transmitted across the switch. To minimize the packet delay bound for an arbitrary traffic matrix, the number of switch configurations in the schedule should be no larger than the switch size. This is called minimum delay scheduling, where the ideal minimum packet delay bound is determined solely by the total overhead of the switch reconfigurations. A speedup in the switch determines the actual packet delay bound, which decreases toward the ideal bound as the speedup increases. Our objective is to minimize the required speedup S schedule under a given actual packet delay bound. We propose a novel minimum delay scheduling algorithm quasi largest-entry-first (QLEF) to solve this problem. Compared with the existing minimum delay scheduling algorithms MIN and α- i-SCALE, QLEF dramatically cuts down the required S schedule bound. For example, QLEF only requires S schedule = 17.89 for N = 450, whereas MIN and α i-SCALE require S schedule = 37.13 and 27.82, respectively. This gives a significant performance gain of 52% over MIN and 36% over α i-SCALE. © 2009 IEEE. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/58794 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.370 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, B | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, KL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, PH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Jiang, X | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-31T03:37:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-31T03:37:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Lightwave Technology, 2009, v. 27 n. 16, p. 3453-3465 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-8724 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/58794 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We consider traffic scheduling in performance guaranteed switches with optical fabrics to ensure 100% throughput and bounded packet delay. Each switch reconfiguration consumes a constant period of time called reconfiguration overhead, during which no packet can be transmitted across the switch. To minimize the packet delay bound for an arbitrary traffic matrix, the number of switch configurations in the schedule should be no larger than the switch size. This is called minimum delay scheduling, where the ideal minimum packet delay bound is determined solely by the total overhead of the switch reconfigurations. A speedup in the switch determines the actual packet delay bound, which decreases toward the ideal bound as the speedup increases. Our objective is to minimize the required speedup S schedule under a given actual packet delay bound. We propose a novel minimum delay scheduling algorithm quasi largest-entry-first (QLEF) to solve this problem. Compared with the existing minimum delay scheduling algorithms MIN and α- i-SCALE, QLEF dramatically cuts down the required S schedule bound. For example, QLEF only requires S schedule = 17.89 for N = 450, whereas MIN and α i-SCALE require S schedule = 37.13 and 27.82, respectively. This gives a significant performance gain of 52% over MIN and 36% over α i-SCALE. © 2009 IEEE. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | I E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=50 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Lightwave Technology | en_HK |
dc.subject | Optical switch | en_HK |
dc.subject | Performance guaranteed switching | en_HK |
dc.subject | Reconfiguration overhead | en_HK |
dc.subject | Scheduling | en_HK |
dc.subject | Speedup | en_HK |
dc.title | Minimum delay scheduling for performance guaranteed switches with optical fabrics | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Yeung, KL:kyeung@eee.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Yeung, KL=rp00204 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/JLT.2008.2005552 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-68349157355 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 150303 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-68349157355&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 16 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 3453 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 3465 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000268347700005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, B=24605804500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeung, KL=7202424908 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, PH=7402211578 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Jiang, X=7404627101 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0733-8724 | - |