File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Transport distraction versus costochondral graft for reconstruction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: which is better?

TitleTransport distraction versus costochondral graft for reconstruction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: which is better?
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tripleo
Citation
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology And Endodontology, 2009, v. 108 n. 1, p. 32-40 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This study compared the methods of transport distraction and costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis. Study design: Bilateral bony TMJ ankylosis was induced in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on one side, whereas costochondral graft was performed on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, condylar remodeling, and recurrence of ankylosis were assessed by clinical, radiological, and histological examinations. Results: Both transport distraction and costochondral graft established a neo-condyle separating from the pseudo-disc with a joint space. The ankylosis scores were higher in the distraction side in the first 12 weeks. Both techniques showed no significant difference in the calcification scores and recurrence of ankylosis in the long term. The maximal jaw movements in 3 directions returned to the pre-ankylosis stage by both methods. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ ankylosis, matching the gold standard of costochondral grafting. © 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58137
ISSN
2011 Impact Factor: 1.457
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
University of Hong Kong10205073/10971/08002/23/01
Funding Information:

This investigation was supported by small project funding from the University of Hong Kong (10205073/10971/08002/23/01).

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorZheng, LWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMa, Len_HK
dc.contributor.authorShi, XJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T03:24:25Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-31T03:24:25Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_HK
dc.identifier.citationOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology And Endodontology, 2009, v. 108 n. 1, p. 32-40en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58137-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study compared the methods of transport distraction and costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis. Study design: Bilateral bony TMJ ankylosis was induced in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on one side, whereas costochondral graft was performed on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, condylar remodeling, and recurrence of ankylosis were assessed by clinical, radiological, and histological examinations. Results: Both transport distraction and costochondral graft established a neo-condyle separating from the pseudo-disc with a joint space. The ankylosis scores were higher in the distraction side in the first 12 weeks. Both techniques showed no significant difference in the calcification scores and recurrence of ankylosis in the long term. The maximal jaw movements in 3 directions returned to the pre-ankylosis stage by both methods. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ ankylosis, matching the gold standard of costochondral grafting. © 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tripleoen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnkylosis - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshArthroplastyen_HK
dc.subject.meshBone Remodeling - physiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantation - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCalcinosis - pathology - physiopathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshCartilage - transplantationen_HK
dc.subject.meshDisease Models, Animalen_HK
dc.subject.meshGoatsen_HK
dc.subject.meshMandibular Condyle - pathology - physiopathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshOsteotomyen_HK
dc.subject.meshRange of Motion, Articular - physiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshReconstructive Surgical Procedures - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshRecurrenceen_HK
dc.subject.meshTemporomandibular Joint Disc - pathology - physiopathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshTemporomandibular Joint Disorders - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshTomography, Spiral Computeden_HK
dc.subject.meshWound Healingen_HK
dc.titleTransport distraction versus costochondral graft for reconstruction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: which is better?en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK:lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailZheng, LW:lwzheng@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityZheng, LW=rp01411en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.030en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid19451010-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-67649419553en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros156026en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-67649419553&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume108en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage32en_HK
dc.identifier.epage40en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1528-395X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000267153700007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZheng, LW=11241247300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMa, L=36071946000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShi, XJ=16231469600en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats