File Download
Supplementary

Article: Tender controversy

TitleTender controversy
Authors
KeywordsArchitecture building and construction
Issue Date1999
PublisherThomson Press Hong Kong Ltd.
Citation
Asian Architect & Contractor, 1999, v. 28 n. 1, p. 2 pps How to Cite?
AbstractA recent press report (see 'Row Over 'Lavish Flat' Contract', South China Morning Post, January 17, 1999) surrounding the award of a $2.3 billion contract to build flats for the disciplined services, has highlighted public divisions of opinion over the criteria that should be employed to choose successful bidders for public works contracts. This month J A McInnis reviews the background to the controversy and some of the implications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/57130

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, JAen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-12T01:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-12T01:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued1999en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAsian Architect & Contractor, 1999, v. 28 n. 1, p. 2 ppsen_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/57130-
dc.description.abstractA recent press report (see 'Row Over 'Lavish Flat' Contract', South China Morning Post, January 17, 1999) surrounding the award of a $2.3 billion contract to build flats for the disciplined services, has highlighted public divisions of opinion over the criteria that should be employed to choose successful bidders for public works contracts. This month J A McInnis reviews the background to the controversy and some of the implications.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherThomson Press Hong Kong Ltd.en_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectArchitecture building and constructionen_HK
dc.titleTender controversyen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcInnis, JA: mcinnis@hku.hken_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros43190-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats