File Download
Supplementary

Article: Division of opinion on compound interest

TitleDivision of opinion on compound interest
Authors
KeywordsArchitecture building and construction
Issue Date1997
PublisherThomson Press Hong Kong Ltd.
Citation
Asian Architect & Contractor, 1997, v. 26 n. 6, p. 68-69 How to Cite?
AbstractThe question of the right of an arbitrator to award compound interest in an award has not been free from controversy. Lately, and before legislative amendments have come into force, this issue was again before the Court of Appeal in A-G v Shimizu Corp [1997] HKLRD 297. This month J.A. McInnis looks at the background to the continuing division of opinion on the subject.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/57100

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, JAen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-12T01:26:04Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-12T01:26:04Z-
dc.date.issued1997en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAsian Architect & Contractor, 1997, v. 26 n. 6, p. 68-69en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/57100-
dc.description.abstractThe question of the right of an arbitrator to award compound interest in an award has not been free from controversy. Lately, and before legislative amendments have come into force, this issue was again before the Court of Appeal in A-G v Shimizu Corp [1997] HKLRD 297. This month J.A. McInnis looks at the background to the continuing division of opinion on the subject.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherThomson Press Hong Kong Ltd.en_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectArchitecture building and constructionen_HK
dc.titleDivision of opinion on compound interesten_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcInnis, JA: mcinnis@hku.hken_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros37271-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats