File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00090.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0035735518
- PMID: 11906629
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Challenges of Recruiting a Vulnerable Population in a Grounded Theory Study
Title | Challenges of Recruiting a Vulnerable Population in a Grounded Theory Study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | ethics grounded theory informed consent primary selection recruitment rigor theoretical sampling vulnerability |
Issue Date | 2001 |
Publisher | Nursing and Health Sciences |
Citation | Challenges of recruiting a vulnerable population in a grounded theory study. Nursing and Health Sciences (2001), 3, 205–211 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Recruitment is a crucial and fundamental part of research and one that poses various degrees of difficulty. This is particularly so when the area of research is one that is either highly sensitive, or that involves participants who are deemed to be particularly vulnerable. This article explores the inherent tensions in matters of participant recruitment among meeting the demands of institutional ethics committees, satisfying the concerns of clinicians in the field and the need to maintain
methodological rigor. A postgraduate research student’s experience of these tensions underpins the discussion. The article concludes with an outline of the student’s strategies and resolution of these issues. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/57055 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.688 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chiang, Vico C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Keatinge, Diana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Ann K | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-22T06:51:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-22T06:51:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Challenges of recruiting a vulnerable population in a grounded theory study. Nursing and Health Sciences (2001), 3, 205–211 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1441-0745 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/57055 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recruitment is a crucial and fundamental part of research and one that poses various degrees of difficulty. This is particularly so when the area of research is one that is either highly sensitive, or that involves participants who are deemed to be particularly vulnerable. This article explores the inherent tensions in matters of participant recruitment among meeting the demands of institutional ethics committees, satisfying the concerns of clinicians in the field and the need to maintain methodological rigor. A postgraduate research student’s experience of these tensions underpins the discussion. The article concludes with an outline of the student’s strategies and resolution of these issues. | en_HK |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Nursing and Health Sciences | en_HK |
dc.subject | ethics | en_HK |
dc.subject | grounded theory | en_HK |
dc.subject | informed consent | en_HK |
dc.subject | primary selection | en_HK |
dc.subject | recruitment | en_HK |
dc.subject | rigor | en_HK |
dc.subject | theoretical sampling | en_HK |
dc.subject | vulnerability | en_HK |
dc.title | Challenges of Recruiting a Vulnerable Population in a Grounded Theory Study | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | postprint | en_HK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00090.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11906629 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0035735518 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1441-0745 | - |