File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Acromial arch shape: assessment with MR imaging

TitleAcromial arch shape: assessment with MR imaging
Authors
KeywordsShoulder, injuries, 414.4813
Shoulder, MR, 414.1214
Tendons, MB., 414.1214
Issue Date1995
PublisherRadiological Society of North America, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://radiology.rsnajnls.org
Citation
Radiology, 1995, v. 195 n. 2, p. 501-505 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND. The long-term management of patients with chronic conditions such as hypertension presents problems for the health services. Shared care addresses these by coordinating care and defining responsibilities. AIM. This study set out to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and cost effectiveness of shared general practitioner-hospital care for well-controlled hypertensive patients in an urban area by comparing three matched groups of patients. METHOD. A total of 554 outpatient clinic attenders, considered suitable for shared care by their consultant, were randomly allocated to shared care or follow up in the outpatient clinic; a third group of 277 patients was selected from a nurse practitioner clinic. Main outcome measures were the proportion of patients in the second year of follow up who had undergone a complete review (blood pressure measurement, serum creatinine level result and electrocardiograph report), acceptability to patients and general practitioners as assessed by questionnaire, and cost per complete review in year two (National Health Service and patient costs). RESULTS. After two years 220 (82%) shared care patients had had a complete review compared with 146 (54%) outpatient clinic attenders and 202 (75%) nurse practitioner clinic attenders. Blood pressure control was similar in each group. Of 297 general practitioners invited, 85% wished to participate in the study; 61% of questionnaire respondents subsequently wanted shared care to continue while 25% were unsure. Half of the patients receiving shared care preferred this method of follow up. The rank order of cost-effectiveness ratios was shared care, nurse practitioner care and conventional outpatient care, relative differences being most marked when only patient costs were considered. CONCLUSION. Shared care for hypertension is feasible in an urban setting, acceptable to the majority of participants and is a cost-effective method of long-term follow up.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/49010
ISSN
2014 Impact Factor: 6.867
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeh, CGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, HRen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTotty, WGen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-12T06:32:11Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-12T06:32:11Z-
dc.date.issued1995en_HK
dc.identifier.citationRadiology, 1995, v. 195 n. 2, p. 501-505en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/49010-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. The long-term management of patients with chronic conditions such as hypertension presents problems for the health services. Shared care addresses these by coordinating care and defining responsibilities. AIM. This study set out to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and cost effectiveness of shared general practitioner-hospital care for well-controlled hypertensive patients in an urban area by comparing three matched groups of patients. METHOD. A total of 554 outpatient clinic attenders, considered suitable for shared care by their consultant, were randomly allocated to shared care or follow up in the outpatient clinic; a third group of 277 patients was selected from a nurse practitioner clinic. Main outcome measures were the proportion of patients in the second year of follow up who had undergone a complete review (blood pressure measurement, serum creatinine level result and electrocardiograph report), acceptability to patients and general practitioners as assessed by questionnaire, and cost per complete review in year two (National Health Service and patient costs). RESULTS. After two years 220 (82%) shared care patients had had a complete review compared with 146 (54%) outpatient clinic attenders and 202 (75%) nurse practitioner clinic attenders. Blood pressure control was similar in each group. Of 297 general practitioners invited, 85% wished to participate in the study; 61% of questionnaire respondents subsequently wanted shared care to continue while 25% were unsure. Half of the patients receiving shared care preferred this method of follow up. The rank order of cost-effectiveness ratios was shared care, nurse practitioner care and conventional outpatient care, relative differences being most marked when only patient costs were considered. CONCLUSION. Shared care for hypertension is feasible in an urban setting, acceptable to the majority of participants and is a cost-effective method of long-term follow up.en_HK
dc.format.extent418 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://radiology.rsnajnls.orgen_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectShoulder, injuries, 414.4813en_HK
dc.subjectShoulder, MR, 414.1214en_HK
dc.subjectTendons, MB., 414.1214en_HK
dc.titleAcromial arch shape: assessment with MR imagingen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0033-8419&volume=195&issue=2&spage=501&epage=505&date=1995&atitle=Acromial+arch+shape:+assessment+with+MR+imagingen_HK
dc.identifier.emailPeh, CG: wcgpeh@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid7724774en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0028951591-
dc.identifier.hkuros1454-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1995QU71700036-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats