File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results

TitleClinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results
Authors
Issue Date1997
PublisherAmerican Dental Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://jada.ada.org
Citation
Journal of American Dental Association, 1997, v. 128 n. 8, p. 1088-1096 How to Cite?
AbstractThe clinical performance of the compomer Dyract (L.D. Caulk, Dentsply) was evaluated and compared with that of the hybrid composite resin Prisma TPH (L.D. Caulk, Dentsply) in restorations of 60 bilateral matched pairs of primary teeth. After 1 year, the overall failure rate for both restorative materials was 1.7 percent. There were no statistically significant differences in recurrence of caries, color matching, marginal integrity or anatomic form. The only statistically significant differences were in marginal discoloration and wear, where the compomer was inferior to the hybrid composite resin. The authors conclude that compomer is a suitable alternative to amalgam for restoring primary teeth.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/48926
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.767
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.661
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHse, KMYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWei, SHYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-12T06:29:51Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-12T06:29:51Z-
dc.date.issued1997en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal of American Dental Association, 1997, v. 128 n. 8, p. 1088-1096en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/48926-
dc.description.abstractThe clinical performance of the compomer Dyract (L.D. Caulk, Dentsply) was evaluated and compared with that of the hybrid composite resin Prisma TPH (L.D. Caulk, Dentsply) in restorations of 60 bilateral matched pairs of primary teeth. After 1 year, the overall failure rate for both restorative materials was 1.7 percent. There were no statistically significant differences in recurrence of caries, color matching, marginal integrity or anatomic form. The only statistically significant differences were in marginal discoloration and wear, where the compomer was inferior to the hybrid composite resin. The authors conclude that compomer is a suitable alternative to amalgam for restoring primary teeth.en_HK
dc.format.extent418 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://jada.ada.orgen_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subject.meshCompomersen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Amalgam - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Caries - therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - classification - methodsen_HK
dc.titleClinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year resultsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0002-8177&volume=128&issue=8&spage=1088&epage=1096&date=1997&atitle=Clinical+evaluation+of+compomer+in+primary+teeth:+1-year+resultsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailWei, SHY: cdowei@hkuxa.hku.hken_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid9260418-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0031203647-
dc.identifier.hkuros31177-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1997XQ05000017-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats