File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: CIR v Quitsubdue Ltd

TitleCIR v Quitsubdue Ltd
慣例已否改變?
Authors
KeywordsLaw
Issue Date1999
PublisherButterworths Asia (HK). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hk-lawyer.com/
Citation
Hong Kong Lawyer, 1999, v. Aug, p. 20-21 How to Cite?
香港律師, 1999, v. Aug, p. 20-21 How to Cite?
AbstractAndrew Halkyard examines a recent court decision holding that the principles laid out by the House of Lords in Sharkey v Wernher do not apply to Hong Kong.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/45506
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHalkyard, AJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-30T06:27:46Z-
dc.date.available2007-10-30T06:27:46Z-
dc.date.issued1999en_HK
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Lawyer, 1999, v. Aug, p. 20-21en_HK
dc.identifier.citation香港律師, 1999, v. Aug, p. 20-21zh_HK
dc.identifier.issn1464-6595en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/45506-
dc.description.abstractAndrew Halkyard examines a recent court decision holding that the principles laid out by the House of Lords in Sharkey v Wernher do not apply to Hong Kong.en_HK
dc.format.extent794609 bytes-
dc.format.extent3615 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain-
dc.languagechien_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherButterworths Asia (HK). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hk-lawyer.com/en_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectLawen_HK
dc.titleCIR v Quitsubdue Ltden_HK
dc.title慣例已否改變?zh_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1464-6595&volume=Aug&spage=20&epage=21&date=1999&atitle=CIR+v+Quitsubdue+Ltden_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats