File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A quantitative comparison of multiple access control protocols for wireless ATM

TitleA quantitative comparison of multiple access control protocols for wireless ATM
Authors
KeywordsAdaptive protocol
FDD
Multiple access control
TDMA
Wireless ATM
Issue Date2001
PublisherI E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=25
Citation
Ieee Transactions On Vehicular Technology, 2001, v. 50 n. 3, p. 796-815 How to Cite?
AbstractThe multiple access control (MAC) problem in a wireless network has intrigued researchers for years. For a broad-band wireless network such as wireless ATM, an effective MAC protocol is very much desired because efficient allocation of channel bandwidth is imperative in accommodating a large user population with satisfactory quality of service. Indeed, MAC protocols for a wireless ATM network in which user traffic requirements are highly heterogeneous (classified into CBR, VBR, and ABR), are even more intricate to design. Considerable research efforts expended in tackling the problem have resulted in a myriad of MAC protocols. While each protocol is individually shown to be effective by the respective designers, it is unclear how these different protocols compare against each other on a unified basis. In this paper, we quantitatively compare seven recently proposed TDMA-based MAC protocols for integrated wireless data and voice services. We first propose a taxonomy of TDMA-based protocols, from which we carefully select seven protocols, namely SCAMA, DTDMA/VR, DTDMA/PR, DQRUMA, DPRMA, DSA++, and PRMA/DA, such that they are devised based on rather orthogonal design philosophies. The objective of our comparison is to highlight the merits and demerits of different protocol designs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/42877
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.243
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.203
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwok, YKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLau, VKNen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2007-03-23T04:33:53Z-
dc.date.available2007-03-23T04:33:53Z-
dc.date.issued2001en_HK
dc.identifier.citationIeee Transactions On Vehicular Technology, 2001, v. 50 n. 3, p. 796-815en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0018-9545en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/42877-
dc.description.abstractThe multiple access control (MAC) problem in a wireless network has intrigued researchers for years. For a broad-band wireless network such as wireless ATM, an effective MAC protocol is very much desired because efficient allocation of channel bandwidth is imperative in accommodating a large user population with satisfactory quality of service. Indeed, MAC protocols for a wireless ATM network in which user traffic requirements are highly heterogeneous (classified into CBR, VBR, and ABR), are even more intricate to design. Considerable research efforts expended in tackling the problem have resulted in a myriad of MAC protocols. While each protocol is individually shown to be effective by the respective designers, it is unclear how these different protocols compare against each other on a unified basis. In this paper, we quantitatively compare seven recently proposed TDMA-based MAC protocols for integrated wireless data and voice services. We first propose a taxonomy of TDMA-based protocols, from which we carefully select seven protocols, namely SCAMA, DTDMA/VR, DTDMA/PR, DQRUMA, DPRMA, DSA++, and PRMA/DA, such that they are devised based on rather orthogonal design philosophies. The objective of our comparison is to highlight the merits and demerits of different protocol designs.en_HK
dc.format.extent421945 bytes-
dc.format.extent26112 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherI E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=25en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technologyen_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.rights©2001 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.en_HK
dc.subjectAdaptive protocolen_HK
dc.subjectFDDen_HK
dc.subjectMultiple access controlen_HK
dc.subjectTDMAen_HK
dc.subjectWireless ATMen_HK
dc.titleA quantitative comparison of multiple access control protocols for wireless ATMen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0018-9545&volume=50&issue=3&spage=796&epage=815&date=2001&atitle=A+quantitative+comparison+of+multiple+access+control+protocols+for+wireless+ATMen_HK
dc.identifier.emailKwok, YK:ykwok@eee.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityKwok, YK=rp00128en_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/25.933314en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035328720en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros60769-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035328720&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume50en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3en_HK
dc.identifier.spage796en_HK
dc.identifier.epage815en_HK
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKwok, YK=7101857718en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, VKN=7005811464en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats