File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Defining the fit and ideal entry site of the fibula rod system––a computed tomography based study in elderly patients with lower limb infections, vascular diseases or tumors

TitleDefining the fit and ideal entry site of the fibula rod system––a computed tomography based study in elderly patients with lower limb infections, vascular diseases or tumors
Authors
Keywordsfibula
fracture
intramedullary
rod
three-dimensional modeling
Issue Date16-Mar-2023
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2023, v. 31, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objectives

To determine the configuration of the distal fibula anatomy and the fitness of the Fibula Rod System (Acumed®, Hillsboro, Oregon) in a series of fibula models and to determine the optimal entry site of the rod.

Methods

Consecutive series of computed tomography (CT) of tibias and fibulae with no fracture or deformity were converted to stereo-lithograph format, and imported into Meshmixer software (Autodesk, San Rafael, California). A 3.6 × 180 mm fibula rod model was virtually inserted to best fit the intramedullary canal of the fibula model and to a depth of 0 mm proud at the distal fibula. The location of the entry point in relationship to the fibular tip, and the distance between the rod and the lateral fibula cortex were measured.

Results

CT of 41 fibulae (23 male and 18 female patients) contributed to the three-dimensional fibula modeling. The entry point was 3.5 mm (SD 2.0) medial to (in mortise view) and 1.0 mm (SD 2.1) anterior to (in lateral view) the fibular tip. The fibula rod was inserted to a depth of 6.2 mm (SD 2.1) proximal to the fibula tip. The mean shortest distance of the rod to the outer cortex was 1.88 mm (SD 0.87). There was a breach of the posterolateral cortex in one patient.

Conclusion

The guide pin entry site of fibula rod should be medial and anterior offset with reference to the fibula tip, in contrary to the distal tip as recommended in the manual. There is a chance of breaching the posterolateral cortex with rod entry.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338681
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.482
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.457
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yan Chun-
dc.contributor.authorYee, Dennis KH-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:30:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:30:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-16-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2023, v. 31, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338681-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine the configuration of the distal fibula anatomy and the fitness of the Fibula Rod System (Acumed®, Hillsboro, Oregon) in a series of fibula models and to determine the optimal entry site of the rod.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive series of computed tomography (CT) of tibias and fibulae with no fracture or deformity were converted to stereo-lithograph format, and imported into Meshmixer software (Autodesk, San Rafael, California). A 3.6 × 180 mm fibula rod model was virtually inserted to best fit the intramedullary canal of the fibula model and to a depth of 0 mm proud at the distal fibula. The location of the entry point in relationship to the fibular tip, and the distance between the rod and the lateral fibula cortex were measured.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>CT of 41 fibulae (23 male and 18 female patients) contributed to the three-dimensional fibula modeling. The entry point was 3.5 mm (SD 2.0) medial to (in mortise view) and 1.0 mm (SD 2.1) anterior to (in lateral view) the fibular tip. The fibula rod was inserted to a depth of 6.2 mm (SD 2.1) proximal to the fibula tip. The mean shortest distance of the rod to the outer cortex was 1.88 mm (SD 0.87). There was a breach of the posterolateral cortex in one patient.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The guide pin entry site of fibula rod should be medial and anterior offset with reference to the fibula tip, in contrary to the distal tip as recommended in the manual. There is a chance of breaching the posterolateral cortex with rod entry.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectfibula-
dc.subjectfracture-
dc.subjectintramedullary-
dc.subjectrod-
dc.subjectthree-dimensional modeling-
dc.titleDefining the fit and ideal entry site of the fibula rod system––a computed tomography based study in elderly patients with lower limb infections, vascular diseases or tumors-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10225536231157129-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85150312837-
dc.identifier.volume31-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2309-4990-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000950122000001-
dc.identifier.issnl1022-5536-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats