File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Chinese nurses' preparedness and opinions in responding to intimate partner violence: An adaptation and validation study

TitleChinese nurses' preparedness and opinions in responding to intimate partner violence: An adaptation and validation study
Authors
KeywordsChina
domestic violence
factor analysis
instrument development
intimate partner violence
nurses
nursing
psychometrics
reliability
validity
Issue Date2022
Citation
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2022, v. 78, n. 11, p. 3847-3859 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To adapt and psychometrically test two scales from The Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) for measuring nurses' preparedness to manage intimate partner violence (IPV) and opinions on IPV in China. Design: A cross-sectional study for cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instruments. Methods: The study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in northeastern and southwestern China in 2020: (Step 1) translation and back-translation by four translators; (Step 2) expert consultation to assess content validity by a five-person panel; (Step 3) cognitive debriefing to evaluate the online survey with six nurses; (Step 4) pilot testing to finalize the survey with 79 nurses; and (Step 5) psychometric evaluation of construct validity and internal consistency reliability including post hoc analysis with 1071 nurses. Results: The Chinese scales of Perceived Preparation and Opinions demonstrated generally acceptable content validity, construct validity and internal consistency reliability; some factor analysis results were uninterpretable, and socially desirable responses existed. A post hoc inspection of item and score distributions assisted the item classification into Confident, Cautious and Concerned regarding the authenticity of nurses' responses. Conclusion: Reliability and construct validity of the Chinese versions of Perceived Preparation and Opinions were supported in this sample. The instrument measures nurses' preparedness and opinions towards IPV. Item classification into Confident, Cautious and Concerned categories is a pragmatic way to interpret the results. Impact: The Chinese scales can be used to measure nurses' preparedness and opinions towards IPV in China. The study also provides an approach for interpretation of results and identification of socially desirable responses in validation and survey studies in other contexts. The adaptation and use of the Chinese scales serve as a primary step in responding to IPV in China's health sector and can be used as a template for adapting the instrument in other low- and middle-income countries.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335889
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.057
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.948

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Quanlei-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Bing-
dc.contributor.authorPerrin, Nancy-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Jacquelyn-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-28T08:49:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-28T08:49:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2022, v. 78, n. 11, p. 3847-3859-
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335889-
dc.description.abstractAim: To adapt and psychometrically test two scales from The Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) for measuring nurses' preparedness to manage intimate partner violence (IPV) and opinions on IPV in China. Design: A cross-sectional study for cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instruments. Methods: The study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in northeastern and southwestern China in 2020: (Step 1) translation and back-translation by four translators; (Step 2) expert consultation to assess content validity by a five-person panel; (Step 3) cognitive debriefing to evaluate the online survey with six nurses; (Step 4) pilot testing to finalize the survey with 79 nurses; and (Step 5) psychometric evaluation of construct validity and internal consistency reliability including post hoc analysis with 1071 nurses. Results: The Chinese scales of Perceived Preparation and Opinions demonstrated generally acceptable content validity, construct validity and internal consistency reliability; some factor analysis results were uninterpretable, and socially desirable responses existed. A post hoc inspection of item and score distributions assisted the item classification into Confident, Cautious and Concerned regarding the authenticity of nurses' responses. Conclusion: Reliability and construct validity of the Chinese versions of Perceived Preparation and Opinions were supported in this sample. The instrument measures nurses' preparedness and opinions towards IPV. Item classification into Confident, Cautious and Concerned categories is a pragmatic way to interpret the results. Impact: The Chinese scales can be used to measure nurses' preparedness and opinions towards IPV in China. The study also provides an approach for interpretation of results and identification of socially desirable responses in validation and survey studies in other contexts. The adaptation and use of the Chinese scales serve as a primary step in responding to IPV in China's health sector and can be used as a template for adapting the instrument in other low- and middle-income countries.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursing-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectdomestic violence-
dc.subjectfactor analysis-
dc.subjectinstrument development-
dc.subjectintimate partner violence-
dc.subjectnurses-
dc.subjectnursing-
dc.subjectpsychometrics-
dc.subjectreliability-
dc.subjectvalidity-
dc.titleChinese nurses' preparedness and opinions in responding to intimate partner violence: An adaptation and validation study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.15415-
dc.identifier.pmid35975282-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85136162861-
dc.identifier.volume78-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage3847-
dc.identifier.epage3859-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats