File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on visual perspective taking: A meta-analytic study

TitleEffects of non-invasive brain stimulation on visual perspective taking: A meta-analytic study
Authors
KeywordsBrain stimulation
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
Meta-analysis
Temporoparietal junction
Visual perspective taking
Issue Date2021
Citation
NeuroImage, 2021, v. 242, article no. 118462 How to Cite?
AbstractVisual perspective taking (VPT) is a critical ability required by complex social interaction. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been increasingly used to examine the causal relationship between brain activity and VPT, yet with heterogeneous results. In the current study, we conducted two meta-analyses to examine the effects of NIBS of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) or dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) on VPT, respectively. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify qualified studies and computed the standardized effect size (ES) for each combination of VPT level (Level-1: visibility judgment; Level-2: mental rotation) and perspective (self and other). Thirteen studies (rTPJ: 12 studies, 23 ESs; dmPFC: 4 studies, 14 ESs) were included in the meta-analyses. Random-effects models were used to generate the overall effects. Subgroup analyses for distinct VPT conditions were also performed. We found that rTPJ stimulation significantly improved participants' visibility judgment from the allocentric perspective, whereas its effects on other VPT conditions are negligible. Stimulation of dmPFC appeared to influence Level-1 performance from the egocentric perspective, although this finding was only based on a small number of studies. Notably, contrary to some theoretical models, we did not find strong evidence that these regions are involved in Level-2 VPT with a higher requirement of mental rotation. These findings not only advance our understanding of the causal roles of the rTPJ and dmPFC in VPT, but also reveal that the efficacy of NIBS on VPT is relatively small. Additionally, researchers should also be cautious about the potential publication bias and selective reporting.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335468
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.400
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.259
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYao, Yuan Wei-
dc.contributor.authorChopurian, Vivien-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lei-
dc.contributor.authorLamm, Claus-
dc.contributor.authorHeekeren, Hauke R.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:26:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:26:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroImage, 2021, v. 242, article no. 118462-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335468-
dc.description.abstractVisual perspective taking (VPT) is a critical ability required by complex social interaction. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been increasingly used to examine the causal relationship between brain activity and VPT, yet with heterogeneous results. In the current study, we conducted two meta-analyses to examine the effects of NIBS of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) or dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) on VPT, respectively. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify qualified studies and computed the standardized effect size (ES) for each combination of VPT level (Level-1: visibility judgment; Level-2: mental rotation) and perspective (self and other). Thirteen studies (rTPJ: 12 studies, 23 ESs; dmPFC: 4 studies, 14 ESs) were included in the meta-analyses. Random-effects models were used to generate the overall effects. Subgroup analyses for distinct VPT conditions were also performed. We found that rTPJ stimulation significantly improved participants' visibility judgment from the allocentric perspective, whereas its effects on other VPT conditions are negligible. Stimulation of dmPFC appeared to influence Level-1 performance from the egocentric perspective, although this finding was only based on a small number of studies. Notably, contrary to some theoretical models, we did not find strong evidence that these regions are involved in Level-2 VPT with a higher requirement of mental rotation. These findings not only advance our understanding of the causal roles of the rTPJ and dmPFC in VPT, but also reveal that the efficacy of NIBS on VPT is relatively small. Additionally, researchers should also be cautious about the potential publication bias and selective reporting.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroImage-
dc.subjectBrain stimulation-
dc.subjectDorsomedial prefrontal cortex-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectTemporoparietal junction-
dc.subjectVisual perspective taking-
dc.titleEffects of non-invasive brain stimulation on visual perspective taking: A meta-analytic study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118462-
dc.identifier.pmid34384909-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85112376889-
dc.identifier.volume242-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 118462-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 118462-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9572-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000693332400014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats