File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of shuttling mechanisms in two constitutionally isomeric bistable rotaxane-based sunlight-powered nanomotors

TitleA comparison of shuttling mechanisms in two constitutionally isomeric bistable rotaxane-based sunlight-powered nanomotors
Authors
Issue Date2006
Citation
Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2006, v. 59, n. 3, p. 193-206 How to Cite?
AbstractTo find out how best to optimize shuttling of the macrocycle in a particular class of photochemically driven molecular abacus, which has the molecular structure of BR-I6+ in its Mark I prototype (Ashton et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3558), we have synthesized and characterized a Mark II version of this kind of two-station rotaxane comprised of six molecular modules, namely (a) a bisparaphenylene[34]crown-10 electron donor macrocycle M and its dumbbell-shaped component which contains (b) a Ru(ii)-polypyridine photoactive unit P2+ as one of its stoppers, (c) a p-terphenyl-type ring system as a rigid spacer S, (d) 4,4?-bipyridinium (A12+) and (e) 3,3?-dimethyl-4,4?-bipyridinium (A22+) electron acceptor units that can play the role of stations for the macrocycle M, and (f) a tetraarylmethane group T as the second stopper. This Mark II version is identical with BR-I6+ in the Mark I series that works as a sunlight-powered nanomotor (Balzani et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1178), except for the swapping of the two stations A12+ and A22+ along the dumbbell-shaped component, i.e. the Mark I and II bistable rotaxanes are constitutionally isomeric. We have found the closer the juxtaposition of the electron transfer photosensitizer P2+ to the better (A12+) of the two electron acceptors, namely the situation in BR-II6+ compared with that in BR-I6+ results in an increase in the rate ? and hence the efficiency ? of the photoinduced electron-transfer step. The rate of the back electron transfer, however, also increases. As a consequence, BR-II 6+ performs better than BR-I6+ in the fuel-assisted system, but much worse when it is powered by visible light (e.g. sunlight) alone. By contrast, when shuttling is electrochemically driven, the only difference between the two bistable rotaxanes in the Mark I and Mark II series is that the macrocycle M moves in opposite directions. © CSIRO 2006.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332660
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.224
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.319
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalzani, Vincenzo-
dc.contributor.authorClemente-León, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorCredi, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorSemeraro, Monica-
dc.contributor.authorVenturi, Margherita-
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Hsian Rong-
dc.contributor.authorWenger, Sabine-
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Sourav-
dc.contributor.authorStoddart, J. Fraser-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:13:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:13:18Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Chemistry, 2006, v. 59, n. 3, p. 193-206-
dc.identifier.issn0004-9425-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332660-
dc.description.abstractTo find out how best to optimize shuttling of the macrocycle in a particular class of photochemically driven molecular abacus, which has the molecular structure of BR-I6+ in its Mark I prototype (Ashton et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3558), we have synthesized and characterized a Mark II version of this kind of two-station rotaxane comprised of six molecular modules, namely (a) a bisparaphenylene[34]crown-10 electron donor macrocycle M and its dumbbell-shaped component which contains (b) a Ru(ii)-polypyridine photoactive unit P2+ as one of its stoppers, (c) a p-terphenyl-type ring system as a rigid spacer S, (d) 4,4?-bipyridinium (A12+) and (e) 3,3?-dimethyl-4,4?-bipyridinium (A22+) electron acceptor units that can play the role of stations for the macrocycle M, and (f) a tetraarylmethane group T as the second stopper. This Mark II version is identical with BR-I6+ in the Mark I series that works as a sunlight-powered nanomotor (Balzani et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1178), except for the swapping of the two stations A12+ and A22+ along the dumbbell-shaped component, i.e. the Mark I and II bistable rotaxanes are constitutionally isomeric. We have found the closer the juxtaposition of the electron transfer photosensitizer P2+ to the better (A12+) of the two electron acceptors, namely the situation in BR-II6+ compared with that in BR-I6+ results in an increase in the rate ? and hence the efficiency ? of the photoinduced electron-transfer step. The rate of the back electron transfer, however, also increases. As a consequence, BR-II 6+ performs better than BR-I6+ in the fuel-assisted system, but much worse when it is powered by visible light (e.g. sunlight) alone. By contrast, when shuttling is electrochemically driven, the only difference between the two bistable rotaxanes in the Mark I and Mark II series is that the macrocycle M moves in opposite directions. © CSIRO 2006.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Chemistry-
dc.titleA comparison of shuttling mechanisms in two constitutionally isomeric bistable rotaxane-based sunlight-powered nanomotors-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/CH06019-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33645238388-
dc.identifier.volume59-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage193-
dc.identifier.epage206-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000236227700007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats