File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness

TitleValidation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness
Authors
KeywordsMental health recovery
Recovery measurement
Severe mental illness
Stage of recovery
Issue Date4-Jul-2023
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Psychiatry, 2023, v. 23, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as a clinically significant measurement for assessing recovery stage of people with mental illness.

Aims: To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness.  

Methods: STORI-30 was translated through forward-backward translation procedures. An expert panel and ten participants were recruited to evaluate face validity, content validity and construct validity. After necessary modifications, the Chinese version STORI-30 plus other convergent and divergent scales were then administered to 113 participants for field test.

Results: Face and content validity were confirmed with acceptable Content Validity Index and high inter-rater agreement from questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure. An ordinal sequence was presented among the five subscales, similar to the original version. Construct validity was supported by positive correlations with other recovery and mental well-being scales, and negative correlation with self-stigma scale. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78-0.86) and high level of test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96)

Conclusions: The Chinese STORI-30 presents satisfactory psychometric properties in internal consistency, construct convergent and divergent validity. The three-factor structure revealed does not echo the original five-stage recovery model. Further studies exploring the underlying structure are warranted.


Keywords: stage of recovery; mental health recovery; recovery measurement; severe mental illness


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331460
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.144
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.437

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Sharon Wing Yung-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Colin Kwok Man-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Siu Man-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:55:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:55:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-04-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry, 2023, v. 23, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331460-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background:</strong> Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as a clinically significant measurement for assessing recovery stage of people with mental illness.</p><p><strong>Aims:</strong> To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness.  </p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> STORI-30 was translated through forward-backward translation procedures. An expert panel and ten participants were recruited to evaluate face validity, content validity and construct validity. After necessary modifications, the Chinese version STORI-30 plus other convergent and divergent scales were then administered to 113 participants for field test.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Face and content validity were confirmed with acceptable Content Validity Index and high inter-rater agreement from questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure. An ordinal sequence was presented among the five subscales, similar to the original version. Construct validity was supported by positive correlations with other recovery and mental well-being scales, and negative correlation with self-stigma scale. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78-0.86) and high level of test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96)</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Chinese STORI-30 presents satisfactory psychometric properties in internal consistency, construct convergent and divergent validity. The three-factor structure revealed does not echo the original five-stage recovery model. Further studies exploring the underlying structure are warranted.</p><p><br></p><p>Keywords: stage of recovery; mental health recovery; recovery measurement; severe mental illness</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMental health recovery-
dc.subjectRecovery measurement-
dc.subjectSevere mental illness-
dc.subjectStage of recovery-
dc.titleValidation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-023-04954-y-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85163977348-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-244X-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-244X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats