File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12888-023-04954-y
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85163977348
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness
Title | Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Mental health recovery Recovery measurement Severe mental illness Stage of recovery |
Issue Date | 4-Jul-2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Citation | BMC Psychiatry, 2023, v. 23, n. 1 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as a clinically significant measurement for assessing recovery stage of people with mental illness. Aims: To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness. Methods: STORI-30 was translated through forward-backward translation procedures. An expert panel and ten participants were recruited to evaluate face validity, content validity and construct validity. After necessary modifications, the Chinese version STORI-30 plus other convergent and divergent scales were then administered to 113 participants for field test. Results: Face and content validity were confirmed with acceptable Content Validity Index and high inter-rater agreement from questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure. An ordinal sequence was presented among the five subscales, similar to the original version. Construct validity was supported by positive correlations with other recovery and mental well-being scales, and negative correlation with self-stigma scale. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78-0.86) and high level of test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96) Conclusions: The Chinese STORI-30 presents satisfactory psychometric properties in internal consistency, construct convergent and divergent validity. The three-factor structure revealed does not echo the original five-stage recovery model. Further studies exploring the underlying structure are warranted. Keywords: stage of recovery; mental health recovery; recovery measurement; severe mental illness |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/331460 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 4.144 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.437 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Sharon Wing Yung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, Colin Kwok Man | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Siu Man | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-21T06:55:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-21T06:55:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-04 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Psychiatry, 2023, v. 23, n. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-244X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/331460 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p><strong>Background:</strong> Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as a clinically significant measurement for assessing recovery stage of people with mental illness.</p><p><strong>Aims:</strong> To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness. </p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> STORI-30 was translated through forward-backward translation procedures. An expert panel and ten participants were recruited to evaluate face validity, content validity and construct validity. After necessary modifications, the Chinese version STORI-30 plus other convergent and divergent scales were then administered to 113 participants for field test.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Face and content validity were confirmed with acceptable Content Validity Index and high inter-rater agreement from questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure. An ordinal sequence was presented among the five subscales, similar to the original version. Construct validity was supported by positive correlations with other recovery and mental well-being scales, and negative correlation with self-stigma scale. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78-0.86) and high level of test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96)</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Chinese STORI-30 presents satisfactory psychometric properties in internal consistency, construct convergent and divergent validity. The three-factor structure revealed does not echo the original five-stage recovery model. Further studies exploring the underlying structure are warranted.</p><p><br></p><p>Keywords: stage of recovery; mental health recovery; recovery measurement; severe mental illness</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Psychiatry | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Mental health recovery | - |
dc.subject | Recovery measurement | - |
dc.subject | Severe mental illness | - |
dc.subject | Stage of recovery | - |
dc.title | Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12888-023-04954-y | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85163977348 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-244X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1471-244X | - |