File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Survival outcomes of optimally treated colorectal metastases: the importance of R0 status in surgical treatment of hepatic and peritoneal surface disease

TitleSurvival outcomes of optimally treated colorectal metastases: the importance of R0 status in surgical treatment of hepatic and peritoneal surface disease
Authors
Issue Date8-Feb-2023
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, v. 30, n. 7, p. 4264-4273 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Although colorectal hepatic metastases (HM) and peritoneal surface disease (PSD) are distinct biologic diseases, they may have similar long-term survival when optimally treated with surgery.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively managed databases. Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resections were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression. Survival was compared over time for the following periods: 1993–2006, 2007–2012, and 2013–2020.

Results

The study enrolled 783 HM patients undergoing liver resection and 204 PSD patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Compared with PSD patients, HM patients more often had R0 resections (90.3% vs. 32.4%), less often had pre-procedure chemotherapy (52.4% vs. 92.1%), and less often were functionally independent (79.7% vs. 95.6%). The 5-year overall survival for HM was 40.9%, with a median survival period of 45.8 months versus 25.8% and 33.4 months, respectively, for PSD (p < 0.05). When stratified by resection status, R0 HM and R0 PSD did not differ significantly in median survival (49.0 vs. 45.4 months; p = 0.83). The median survival after R1 resection also was similar between HM and PSD (32.6 vs. 26.9 months; p = 0.59). Survival between the two groups again was similar over time when stratified by resection status. The predictors of survival for HM patients were R0 resection, number of lesions, intraoperative transfusion, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the PSD patients, the predictors were peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, estimated blood loss (EBL), and female gender.

Conclusion

The study showed that R0 resections are associated with improved outcomes and that median survival is similar between HM and PSD patients when it is achieved. Surveillance and treatment strategies that facilitate R0 resections are needed to improve results, particularly for PSD.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331224
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.339
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.764

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSolsky, I-
dc.contributor.authorMoaven, O-
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, CD-
dc.contributor.authorLundy, M-
dc.contributor.authorStauffer, JA-
dc.contributor.authorDel Piccolo, NR-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, T-
dc.contributor.authorCorvera, CU-
dc.contributor.authorWisneski, AD-
dc.contributor.authorCha, CR-
dc.contributor.authorZarandi, NP-
dc.contributor.authorDourado, J-
dc.contributor.authorRussell, G-
dc.contributor.authorLevine, EA-
dc.contributor.authorVotanopoulos, KL-
dc.contributor.authorShen, PRY -
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:53:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:53:51Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-08-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, v. 30, n. 7, p. 4264-4273-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331224-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Although colorectal hepatic metastases (HM) and peritoneal surface disease (PSD) are distinct biologic diseases, they may have similar long-term survival when optimally treated with surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively managed databases. Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resections were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression. Survival was compared over time for the following periods: 1993–2006, 2007–2012, and 2013–2020.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The study enrolled 783 HM patients undergoing liver resection and 204 PSD patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Compared with PSD patients, HM patients more often had R0 resections (90.3% vs. 32.4%), less often had pre-procedure chemotherapy (52.4% vs. 92.1%), and less often were functionally independent (79.7% vs. 95.6%). The 5-year overall survival for HM was 40.9%, with a median survival period of 45.8 months versus 25.8% and 33.4 months, respectively, for PSD (<em>p</em> < 0.05). When stratified by resection status, R0 HM and R0 PSD did not differ significantly in median survival (49.0 vs. 45.4 months; <em>p</em> = 0.83). The median survival after R1 resection also was similar between HM and PSD (32.6 vs. 26.9 months; <em>p</em> = 0.59). Survival between the two groups again was similar over time when stratified by resection status. The predictors of survival for HM patients were R0 resection, number of lesions, intraoperative transfusion, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the PSD patients, the predictors were peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, estimated blood loss (EBL), and female gender.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study showed that R0 resections are associated with improved outcomes and that median survival is similar between HM and PSD patients when it is achieved. Surveillance and treatment strategies that facilitate R0 resections are needed to improve results, particularly for PSD.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Surgical Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleSurvival outcomes of optimally treated colorectal metastases: the importance of R0 status in surgical treatment of hepatic and peritoneal surface disease-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-023-13174-3-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147719735-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage4264-
dc.identifier.epage4273-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.issnl1068-9265-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats