File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of mRNA and Inactivated Whole Virus Vaccines Against COVID-19 in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases

TitleEfficacy of mRNA and Inactivated Whole Virus Vaccines Against COVID-19 in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases
Authors
Keywordsasthma
bronchiectasis
COPD
COVID-19
vaccine
Issue Date1-Jan-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2023, v. 18, p. 47-56 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: While different COVID-19 vaccines have been developed, there has been lack of data on the efficacy comparison between mRNA and inactivated whole virus vaccine among patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis.Methods: This was a retrospective case control study on the efficacy of BNT162b2 (mRNA vaccine) and CoronaVac (inactivated whole virus vaccine) against COVID-19 in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. A total of 327 patients were included, with 109 patients infected with COVID-19 matched with 218 patients without COVID-19. The co-primary outcomes were vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19-related hospitalization and COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated using the formula (1-adjusted odds ratio) x 100.Results: Patients who received at least 2 doses of CoronaVac had lower risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure than those who did not have vaccination, with adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.189 (95% CI = 0.050-0.714, p = 0.014) and 0.128 (95% CI = 0.026-0.638, p = 0.012) respectively. Patients who received at least 2 doses of BNT162b2 had lower risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure than those who did not have vaccination with adjusted OR of 0.207 (95% CI = 0.043-0.962, p = 0.050) and 0.093 (95% CI = 0.011-0.827, p = 0.033) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the risks of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure between patients who received at least 2 doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2.Conclusion: BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines are effective in preventing hospitalization for COVID-19 and respiratory failure complicating COVID-19 among patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Patients with chronic respiratory diseases should be encouraged to have COVID-19 vaccination.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329015
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 2.732
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.394

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwok, WC-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, SHI-
dc.contributor.authorTam, TCC-
dc.contributor.authorHo, JCM-
dc.contributor.authorLam, DCL-
dc.contributor.authorIp, MSM-
dc.contributor.authorHo, PL-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T07:54:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T07:54:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2023, v. 18, p. 47-56-
dc.identifier.issn1176-9106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329015-
dc.description.abstract<p> Background: While different COVID-19 vaccines have been developed, there has been lack of data on the efficacy comparison between mRNA and inactivated whole virus vaccine among patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis.Methods: This was a retrospective case control study on the efficacy of BNT162b2 (mRNA vaccine) and CoronaVac (inactivated whole virus vaccine) against COVID-19 in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. A total of 327 patients were included, with 109 patients infected with COVID-19 matched with 218 patients without COVID-19. The co-primary outcomes were vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19-related hospitalization and COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated using the formula (1-adjusted odds ratio) x 100.Results: Patients who received at least 2 doses of CoronaVac had lower risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure than those who did not have vaccination, with adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.189 (95% CI = 0.050-0.714, p = 0.014) and 0.128 (95% CI = 0.026-0.638, p = 0.012) respectively. Patients who received at least 2 doses of BNT162b2 had lower risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure than those who did not have vaccination with adjusted OR of 0.207 (95% CI = 0.043-0.962, p = 0.050) and 0.093 (95% CI = 0.011-0.827, p = 0.033) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the risks of being hospitalized for COVID-19 and developing respiratory failure between patients who received at least 2 doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2.Conclusion: BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines are effective in preventing hospitalization for COVID-19 and respiratory failure complicating COVID-19 among patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Patients with chronic respiratory diseases should be encouraged to have COVID-19 vaccination. <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectasthma-
dc.subjectbronchiectasis-
dc.subjectCOPD-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectvaccine-
dc.titleEfficacy of mRNA and Inactivated Whole Virus Vaccines Against COVID-19 in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/COPD.S394101-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85146782299-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.spage47-
dc.identifier.epage56-
dc.identifier.eissn1178-2005-
dc.identifier.issnl1176-9106-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats