File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predicting three dimensions of police officer stress: does rural or urban setting matter?

TitlePredicting three dimensions of police officer stress: does rural or urban setting matter?
Authors
KeywordsChina
Police stress
Resources and training
Rural–urban differences
Issue Date2020
Citation
Policing, 2020, v. 43, n. 3, p. 435-449 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the disparities in stress between rural and urban police officers in China. Design/methodology/approach: Data for this study were collected from a national police university in China in 2017. In total, 608 Chinese police officers were surveyed representing those attending in-service training program in the university. Findings: Results showed that rural police officers exhibited a higher level of somatization compared to their urban counterparts, whereas no rural–urban differences were detected for other stress dimensions – anxiety and depression. Additionally, this study suggests that perceived constraints in resources and training partially mediate the observed rural–urban disparities in somatization. Research limitations/implications: This study is based on a convenient sample of Chinese police officers, which restricts the generalizability of the results. Practical implications: To reduce stress among police officers, China needs to make more investments in resources and training programs in its rural policing. Originality/value: A review of literature reveals that studies comparing police stress between rural and urban areas are rare. Additionally, China, as the largest developing nation in the world, remains under-studied with respect to stress among its police officers.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324109
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.919
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.817
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Guangzhen-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Ming-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T03:01:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T03:01:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPolicing, 2020, v. 43, n. 3, p. 435-449-
dc.identifier.issn1363-951X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324109-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the disparities in stress between rural and urban police officers in China. Design/methodology/approach: Data for this study were collected from a national police university in China in 2017. In total, 608 Chinese police officers were surveyed representing those attending in-service training program in the university. Findings: Results showed that rural police officers exhibited a higher level of somatization compared to their urban counterparts, whereas no rural–urban differences were detected for other stress dimensions – anxiety and depression. Additionally, this study suggests that perceived constraints in resources and training partially mediate the observed rural–urban disparities in somatization. Research limitations/implications: This study is based on a convenient sample of Chinese police officers, which restricts the generalizability of the results. Practical implications: To reduce stress among police officers, China needs to make more investments in resources and training programs in its rural policing. Originality/value: A review of literature reveals that studies comparing police stress between rural and urban areas are rare. Additionally, China, as the largest developing nation in the world, remains under-studied with respect to stress among its police officers.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPolicing-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectPolice stress-
dc.subjectResources and training-
dc.subjectRural–urban differences-
dc.titlePredicting three dimensions of police officer stress: does rural or urban setting matter?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2019-0042-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85074877418-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage435-
dc.identifier.epage449-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000537145500002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats