File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: CACTI: Use of a survey instrument as a semistructured interview protocol to facilitate teacher retrospection on bi/multilingual practices in EMI

TitleCACTI: Use of a survey instrument as a semistructured interview protocol to facilitate teacher retrospection on bi/multilingual practices in EMI
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
System, 2022, v. 109, p. 102887 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this study, the researchers used a survey as a semistructured interview protocol to examine teachers' use of students' other languages in English-medium instruction (EMI) by conducting interviews with 16 primary and secondary teachers in EMI schools in Hong Kong, Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang. During the two parts of the interview (Part 1: Demographic Information and Part 2: Bi/multilingual Practices), which lasted 1.5–2 h, teachers shared their pedagogical practices based on one class of primary or secondary students. Part 1 elicited teachers’ geographic and institutional context, grade and subject matter, class language demographics, and teacher language knowledge, while Part 2 consisted of 30 multiple choice items representing different bi/multilingual classroom practices, categorized based on the literature into learning purposes, pedagogical or spontaneous practices, classroom language policies, and modality directions. Teachers rated the importance of each of the 30 practices on a Likert scale (”5/Very important” to “1/Not important”) and gave justifications and explanations that were coded inductively. Table and interview analyses show (1) which practices stood out as the most controversial, (2) what deliberations about contextual factors were involved in decision-making about them, and (3) implications for teacher professional development.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316280
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, AV-
dc.contributor.authorOu, J-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-02T06:08:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-02T06:08:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSystem, 2022, v. 109, p. 102887-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316280-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the researchers used a survey as a semistructured interview protocol to examine teachers' use of students' other languages in English-medium instruction (EMI) by conducting interviews with 16 primary and secondary teachers in EMI schools in Hong Kong, Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang. During the two parts of the interview (Part 1: Demographic Information and Part 2: Bi/multilingual Practices), which lasted 1.5–2 h, teachers shared their pedagogical practices based on one class of primary or secondary students. Part 1 elicited teachers’ geographic and institutional context, grade and subject matter, class language demographics, and teacher language knowledge, while Part 2 consisted of 30 multiple choice items representing different bi/multilingual classroom practices, categorized based on the literature into learning purposes, pedagogical or spontaneous practices, classroom language policies, and modality directions. Teachers rated the importance of each of the 30 practices on a Likert scale (”5/Very important” to “1/Not important”) and gave justifications and explanations that were coded inductively. Table and interview analyses show (1) which practices stood out as the most controversial, (2) what deliberations about contextual factors were involved in decision-making about them, and (3) implications for teacher professional development.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSystem-
dc.titleCACTI: Use of a survey instrument as a semistructured interview protocol to facilitate teacher retrospection on bi/multilingual practices in EMI-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailMendoza, AV: annamend@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMendoza, AV=rp02751-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.system.2022.102887-
dc.identifier.hkuros336377-
dc.identifier.volume109-
dc.identifier.spage102887-
dc.identifier.epage102887-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000843746200002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats