File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Image quality and radiation exposure in CT of the pancreas: 320-MDCT with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction versus 64-MDCT

TitleImage quality and radiation exposure in CT of the pancreas: 320-MDCT with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction versus 64-MDCT
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
Clinical Radiology, 2013, v. 68, n. 11 How to Cite?
AbstractAim To compare the image quality and radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) of the pancreas acquired using 320-multidetector (MD)CT versus 64-MDCT and to demonstrate the effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on 320-MDCT. Materials and methods One hundred and fifty patients were randomized into three groups including 320-section volume imaging using AIDR (group A), 320-slice volume scan without AIDR (group B), and 64-section helical imaging without AIDR (group C). Transaxial arterial, pancreatic phase, and volume-rendered CT angiographic images were reconstructed. CT radiodensity of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), dose-length products (DLPs; mGy cm), and image quality were measured. Results No significant difference in CT radiodensity of the abdominal aorta or pancreas was noted between groups. Mean DLPs were 600.9 ± 145.8, 681.6 ± 97.5, and 1231.5 ± 271.4 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The DLP was reduced by 51% in group A and 45% in group B compared to group C (p < 0.001). SNRs of the pancreas during the pancreatic phase were comparable between groups A and C, but were significantly lower in group B (p < 0.001). Image quality, including the depiction of some small arterial branches on the arterial and CT angiographic images and the main pancreatic duct on the pancreatic-phase images, were significantly lower in group B than in groups A and C (p = 0.008-0.038). Conclusion Radiation dose can be markedly reduced for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the pancreas without compromising image quality using a 320-MDCT with AIDR, compared with 64-section helical CT. © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316080
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.389
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.778
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoshima, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKanematsu, M.-
dc.contributor.authorNishibori, H.-
dc.contributor.authorMiyazawa, D.-
dc.contributor.authorKondo, H.-
dc.contributor.authorMoriyama, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBae, K. T.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:49:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:49:10Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Radiology, 2013, v. 68, n. 11-
dc.identifier.issn0009-9260-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316080-
dc.description.abstractAim To compare the image quality and radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) of the pancreas acquired using 320-multidetector (MD)CT versus 64-MDCT and to demonstrate the effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on 320-MDCT. Materials and methods One hundred and fifty patients were randomized into three groups including 320-section volume imaging using AIDR (group A), 320-slice volume scan without AIDR (group B), and 64-section helical imaging without AIDR (group C). Transaxial arterial, pancreatic phase, and volume-rendered CT angiographic images were reconstructed. CT radiodensity of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), dose-length products (DLPs; mGy cm), and image quality were measured. Results No significant difference in CT radiodensity of the abdominal aorta or pancreas was noted between groups. Mean DLPs were 600.9 ± 145.8, 681.6 ± 97.5, and 1231.5 ± 271.4 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The DLP was reduced by 51% in group A and 45% in group B compared to group C (p < 0.001). SNRs of the pancreas during the pancreatic phase were comparable between groups A and C, but were significantly lower in group B (p < 0.001). Image quality, including the depiction of some small arterial branches on the arterial and CT angiographic images and the main pancreatic duct on the pancreatic-phase images, were significantly lower in group B than in groups A and C (p = 0.008-0.038). Conclusion Radiation dose can be markedly reduced for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the pancreas without compromising image quality using a 320-MDCT with AIDR, compared with 64-section helical CT. © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Radiology-
dc.titleImage quality and radiation exposure in CT of the pancreas: 320-MDCT with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction versus 64-MDCT-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.102-
dc.identifier.pmid23916551-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84885020386-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-229X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000331167100005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats