File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation

TitleValidation of CT dose-reduction simulation
Authors
KeywordsBowtie filter
Computed tomography
CT
Dose reduction
Four-alternative forced-choice (4AFC)
Just noticeable difference (JND)
Noise modeling
Observer study
Tube current modulation
Issue Date2009
Citation
Medical Physics, 2009, v. 36, n. 1, p. 174-189 How to Cite?
AbstractThe objective of this research was to develop and validate a custom computed tomography dose-reduction simulation technique for producing images that have an appearance consistent with the same scan performed at a lower mAs (with fixed kVp, rotation time, and collimation). Synthetic noise is added to projection (sinogram) data, incorporating a stochastic noise model that includes energy-integrating detectors, tube-current modulation, bowtie beam filtering, and electronic system noise. Experimental methods were developed to determine the parameters required for each component of the noise model. As a validation, the outputs of the simulations were compared to measurements with cadavers in the image domain and with phantoms in both the sinogram and image domain, using an unbiased root-mean-square relative error metric to quantify agreement in noise processes. Four-alternative forced-choice (4AFC) observer studies were conducted to confirm the realistic appearance of simulated noise, and the effects of various system model components on visual noise were studied. The "just noticeable difference (JND)" in noise levels was analyzed to determine the sensitivity of observers to changes in noise level. Individual detector measurements were shown to be normally distributed (p>0.54), justifying the use of a Gaussian random noise generator for simulations. Phantom tests showed the ability to match original and simulated noise variance in the sinogram domain to within 5.6%±1.6% (standard deviation), which was then propagated into the image domain with errors less than 4.1%±1.6%. Cadaver measurements indicated that image noise was matched to within 2.6%±2.0%. More importantly, the 4AFC observer studies indicated that the simulated images were realistic, i.e., no detectable difference between simulated and original images (p=0.86) was observed. JND studies indicated that observers' sensitivity to change in noise levels corresponded to a 25% difference in dose, which is far larger than the noise accuracy achieved by simulation. In summary, the dose-reduction simulation tool demonstrated excellent accuracy in providing realistic images. The methodology promises to be a useful tool for researchers and radiologists to explore dose reduction protocols in an effort to produce diagnostic images with radiation dose "as low as reasonably achievable." © 2009 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316010
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.506
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.473
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMassoumzadeh, Parinaz-
dc.contributor.authorDon, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorHildebolt, Charles F.-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.contributor.authorWhiting, Bruce R.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:48:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:48:56Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Physics, 2009, v. 36, n. 1, p. 174-189-
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316010-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research was to develop and validate a custom computed tomography dose-reduction simulation technique for producing images that have an appearance consistent with the same scan performed at a lower mAs (with fixed kVp, rotation time, and collimation). Synthetic noise is added to projection (sinogram) data, incorporating a stochastic noise model that includes energy-integrating detectors, tube-current modulation, bowtie beam filtering, and electronic system noise. Experimental methods were developed to determine the parameters required for each component of the noise model. As a validation, the outputs of the simulations were compared to measurements with cadavers in the image domain and with phantoms in both the sinogram and image domain, using an unbiased root-mean-square relative error metric to quantify agreement in noise processes. Four-alternative forced-choice (4AFC) observer studies were conducted to confirm the realistic appearance of simulated noise, and the effects of various system model components on visual noise were studied. The "just noticeable difference (JND)" in noise levels was analyzed to determine the sensitivity of observers to changes in noise level. Individual detector measurements were shown to be normally distributed (p>0.54), justifying the use of a Gaussian random noise generator for simulations. Phantom tests showed the ability to match original and simulated noise variance in the sinogram domain to within 5.6%±1.6% (standard deviation), which was then propagated into the image domain with errors less than 4.1%±1.6%. Cadaver measurements indicated that image noise was matched to within 2.6%±2.0%. More importantly, the 4AFC observer studies indicated that the simulated images were realistic, i.e., no detectable difference between simulated and original images (p=0.86) was observed. JND studies indicated that observers' sensitivity to change in noise levels corresponded to a 25% difference in dose, which is far larger than the noise accuracy achieved by simulation. In summary, the dose-reduction simulation tool demonstrated excellent accuracy in providing realistic images. The methodology promises to be a useful tool for researchers and radiologists to explore dose reduction protocols in an effort to produce diagnostic images with radiation dose "as low as reasonably achievable." © 2009 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Physics-
dc.subjectBowtie filter-
dc.subjectComputed tomography-
dc.subjectCT-
dc.subjectDose reduction-
dc.subjectFour-alternative forced-choice (4AFC)-
dc.subjectJust noticeable difference (JND)-
dc.subjectNoise modeling-
dc.subjectObserver study-
dc.subjectTube current modulation-
dc.titleValidation of CT dose-reduction simulation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1118/1.3031114-
dc.identifier.pmid19235386-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-58149136841-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage174-
dc.identifier.epage189-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000262105200021-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats