File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Sonographic assessment of the severity and progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: The Consortium of Renal Imaging Studies in Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP)

TitleSonographic assessment of the severity and progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: The Consortium of Renal Imaging Studies in Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP)
Authors
KeywordsKidney volume
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrasonography
Issue Date2005
Citation
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2005, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1058-1064 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The accuracy and precision of ultrasonography (US) in assessing the severity of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is unknown. Methods: US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at baseline and 1 year on 230 subjects with ADPKD. Ellipsoid volume was calculated from US length, width, and depth, and sequential transverse images were used to measure total and cystic volume directly. These were compared with MRI measurements of kidney volume and cystic volume. Results: Variability between different sonographers ranged from 18% to 42%. Correlations between US and MRI volume were 0.88 and 0.89. The SD of the discrepancy from MRI ranged from 21% to 33% and was unrelated to kidney size or body mass. Kidney length was the most reproducible measurement, and its correlation with MRI volume was 0.84. All patients with an US volume less than 700 cm3 had an MRI volume less than 1,000 cm3, and all patients with an US volume greater than 1,700 cm3 had an MRI volume greater than 1,000 cm3. Increases in volume after 1 year were 12% ± 36% for the ellipsoid method, 6% ± 29% for the direct method, and 4.2% ± 7.2% for MRI. Correlation between US and MRI measurement of fractional cyst volume was 0.80. Conclusion: Sonographic measurement of kidney volume in patients with ADPKD is inaccurate and lacks the precision necessary to measure short-term disease progression. However, sonography can provide an estimate of kidney volume that reflects severity and prognosis in individual patients. © 2005 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315967
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 11.072
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.677
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, W. Charles-
dc.contributor.authorRobbin, Michelle L.-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.contributor.authorGrantham, Jared J.-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Arlene B.-
dc.contributor.authorGuay-Woodford, Lisa M.-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Vicente E.-
dc.contributor.authorKing, Bernard F.-
dc.contributor.authorWetzel, Louis H.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Paul A.-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, J. Philip-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:48:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:48:46Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2005, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1058-1064-
dc.identifier.issn0272-6386-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315967-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The accuracy and precision of ultrasonography (US) in assessing the severity of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is unknown. Methods: US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at baseline and 1 year on 230 subjects with ADPKD. Ellipsoid volume was calculated from US length, width, and depth, and sequential transverse images were used to measure total and cystic volume directly. These were compared with MRI measurements of kidney volume and cystic volume. Results: Variability between different sonographers ranged from 18% to 42%. Correlations between US and MRI volume were 0.88 and 0.89. The SD of the discrepancy from MRI ranged from 21% to 33% and was unrelated to kidney size or body mass. Kidney length was the most reproducible measurement, and its correlation with MRI volume was 0.84. All patients with an US volume less than 700 cm3 had an MRI volume less than 1,000 cm3, and all patients with an US volume greater than 1,700 cm3 had an MRI volume greater than 1,000 cm3. Increases in volume after 1 year were 12% ± 36% for the ellipsoid method, 6% ± 29% for the direct method, and 4.2% ± 7.2% for MRI. Correlation between US and MRI measurement of fractional cyst volume was 0.80. Conclusion: Sonographic measurement of kidney volume in patients with ADPKD is inaccurate and lacks the precision necessary to measure short-term disease progression. However, sonography can provide an estimate of kidney volume that reflects severity and prognosis in individual patients. © 2005 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases-
dc.subjectKidney volume-
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subjectUltrasonography-
dc.titleSonographic assessment of the severity and progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: The Consortium of Renal Imaging Studies in Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.026-
dc.identifier.pmid16310571-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-28044456536-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1058-
dc.identifier.epage1064-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000233933600007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats