File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Social inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study

TitleSocial inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study
Authors
KeywordsSocioeconomic position
Physical functioning
Epidemiology
Humans
Issue Date2009
Citation
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2009, v. 64, n. 10, p. 1082-1089 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground. We investigated social inequalities in walking speed in early old age. Methods. Walking speed was measured by timed 8-ft (2.44 m) test in 6,345 individuals, with mean age of 61.1 (SD 6.0) years. Current or last known civil service employment grade defined socioeconomic position. Results. Mean walking speed was 1.36 (SD 0.29) m/s in men and 1.21 (SD 0.30) in women. Average age- and ethnicity-adjusted walking speed was approximately 13% higher in the highest employment grade compared with the lowest. Based on the relative index of inequality (RII), the difference in walking speed across the social hierarchy was 0.15 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.18) in men and 0.17 m/s (0.12-0.22) in women, corresponding to an age-related difference of 18.7 (13.6-23.8) years in men and 14.9 (9.9-19.9) years in women. The RII for slow walking speed (logistic model for lowest sex-specific quartile vs others) adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity was 3.40 (2.64-4.36). Explanatory factors for the social gradient in walking speed included Short-Form 36 physical functioning, labor market status, financial insecurity, height, and body mass index. Demographic, psychosocial, behavioral, biologic, and health factors in combination accounted for 40% of social inequality in walking speed. Conclusion. Social inequality in walking speed is substantial in early old age and reflects many factors beyond the direct effects of physical health. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307073
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.591
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.134
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrunner, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorShipley, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorKivimaki, Mika-
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Tarani-
dc.contributor.authorGimeno, David-
dc.contributor.authorSingh-Manoux, Archana-
dc.contributor.authorGuralnik, Jack-
dc.contributor.authorMarmot, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2009, v. 64, n. 10, p. 1082-1089-
dc.identifier.issn1079-5006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307073-
dc.description.abstractBackground. We investigated social inequalities in walking speed in early old age. Methods. Walking speed was measured by timed 8-ft (2.44 m) test in 6,345 individuals, with mean age of 61.1 (SD 6.0) years. Current or last known civil service employment grade defined socioeconomic position. Results. Mean walking speed was 1.36 (SD 0.29) m/s in men and 1.21 (SD 0.30) in women. Average age- and ethnicity-adjusted walking speed was approximately 13% higher in the highest employment grade compared with the lowest. Based on the relative index of inequality (RII), the difference in walking speed across the social hierarchy was 0.15 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.18) in men and 0.17 m/s (0.12-0.22) in women, corresponding to an age-related difference of 18.7 (13.6-23.8) years in men and 14.9 (9.9-19.9) years in women. The RII for slow walking speed (logistic model for lowest sex-specific quartile vs others) adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity was 3.40 (2.64-4.36). Explanatory factors for the social gradient in walking speed included Short-Form 36 physical functioning, labor market status, financial insecurity, height, and body mass index. Demographic, psychosocial, behavioral, biologic, and health factors in combination accounted for 40% of social inequality in walking speed. Conclusion. Social inequality in walking speed is substantial in early old age and reflects many factors beyond the direct effects of physical health. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic position-
dc.subjectPhysical functioning-
dc.subjectEpidemiology-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.titleSocial inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/gerona/glp078-
dc.identifier.pmid19535784-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4851984-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-69949094411-
dc.identifier.volume64-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1082-
dc.identifier.epage1089-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000269610600009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats