File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: First-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Asian subgroup analysis of CROWN

TitleFirst-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Asian subgroup analysis of CROWN
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology
Citation
European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, Virtual Meeting, Paris, France, 16-21 September 2021. Abstracts Book in Annals of Oncology, 2021, v. 32 n. Suppl. 5, p. S955-S956, Abstract 1197P How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Lorlatinib, a 3rd-generation ALK inhibitor, significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs crizotinib in the CROWN trial in patients with untreated ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report data from the Asian subgroup of CROWN. Methods: In this ongoing phase III trial (NCT03052608), untreated patients (n = 296) with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were randomised to lorlatinib or crizotinib, stratified by presence of brain metastases and ethnicity (Asian/non-Asian). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review. Primary and key secondary endpoints were analysed in the Asian subgroup (unstratified analyses). Results: In the Asian subgroup, 120 patients were randomised (59 to lorlatinib, 61 to crizotinib [1 not treated]): 48 in Japan, 21 South Korea, 20 mainland China, 16 Taiwan, 8 Singapore and 7 Hong Kong. Baseline characteristics (median age: 61 and 55 years; female: 46% and 61% for lorlatinib and crizotinib, respectively) were similar to the overall population except for a slightly greater gender imbalance between treatments. Lorlatinib prolonged PFS and increased overall and intracranial response vs crizotinib (Table). The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) with lorlatinib were hypertriglyceridaemia (68%), hypercholesterolaemia (68%), oedema (44%) and weight increased (42%), and with crizotinib were nausea (58%), diarrhoea (58%), vomiting (45%), vision disorder (43%) and constipation (42%). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported by 78% (lorlatinib) vs 60% (crizotinib). Fewer patients had AEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation in the lorlatinib arm (6.8%) than the crizotinib arm (11.7%). Conclusions: In the Asian subgroup, a consistent and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS was observed for lorlatinib vs crizotinib. The efficacy and safety of lorlatinib vs crizotinib in the Asian subgroup of CROWN was consistent with the overall population.
DescriptionePoster Display - no. 1197P
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306857
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 51.769
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 7.954
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Q-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HR-
dc.contributor.authorSoo, R-
dc.contributor.authorChang, GC-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, CH-
dc.contributor.authorHayashi, H-
dc.contributor.authorKim, SW-
dc.contributor.authorTeraoka, S-
dc.contributor.authorGoto, Y-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, VHF-
dc.contributor.authorHan, B-
dc.contributor.authorHo, JCM-
dc.contributor.authorKim, DW-
dc.contributor.authorLin, CC-
dc.contributor.authorLu, S-
dc.contributor.authorPolli, A-
dc.contributor.authorCalella, AM-
dc.contributor.authorMok, T-
dc.contributor.authorWu, YL-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-22T07:40:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-22T07:40:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, Virtual Meeting, Paris, France, 16-21 September 2021. Abstracts Book in Annals of Oncology, 2021, v. 32 n. Suppl. 5, p. S955-S956, Abstract 1197P-
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306857-
dc.descriptionePoster Display - no. 1197P-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lorlatinib, a 3rd-generation ALK inhibitor, significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs crizotinib in the CROWN trial in patients with untreated ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report data from the Asian subgroup of CROWN. Methods: In this ongoing phase III trial (NCT03052608), untreated patients (n = 296) with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were randomised to lorlatinib or crizotinib, stratified by presence of brain metastases and ethnicity (Asian/non-Asian). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review. Primary and key secondary endpoints were analysed in the Asian subgroup (unstratified analyses). Results: In the Asian subgroup, 120 patients were randomised (59 to lorlatinib, 61 to crizotinib [1 not treated]): 48 in Japan, 21 South Korea, 20 mainland China, 16 Taiwan, 8 Singapore and 7 Hong Kong. Baseline characteristics (median age: 61 and 55 years; female: 46% and 61% for lorlatinib and crizotinib, respectively) were similar to the overall population except for a slightly greater gender imbalance between treatments. Lorlatinib prolonged PFS and increased overall and intracranial response vs crizotinib (Table). The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) with lorlatinib were hypertriglyceridaemia (68%), hypercholesterolaemia (68%), oedema (44%) and weight increased (42%), and with crizotinib were nausea (58%), diarrhoea (58%), vomiting (45%), vision disorder (43%) and constipation (42%). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported by 78% (lorlatinib) vs 60% (crizotinib). Fewer patients had AEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation in the lorlatinib arm (6.8%) than the crizotinib arm (11.7%). Conclusions: In the Asian subgroup, a consistent and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS was observed for lorlatinib vs crizotinib. The efficacy and safety of lorlatinib vs crizotinib in the Asian subgroup of CROWN was consistent with the overall population.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Oncology-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, 2021-
dc.titleFirst-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Asian subgroup analysis of CROWN-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailHo, JCM: jhocm@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHo, JCM=rp00258-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1802-
dc.identifier.hkuros328660-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. 5-
dc.identifier.spageS955-
dc.identifier.epageS956-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000700527702216-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats