File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Bounce or stream? Motion dynamics modulate the audiovisual bounce inducing effect

TitleBounce or stream? Motion dynamics modulate the audiovisual bounce inducing effect
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/
Citation
20th Vision Sciences Society (VSS) Annual Meeting, Virtual Meeting, 19-24 June 2020. In Journal of Vision, 2020, v. 20 n. 11, abstract no. 953 How to Cite?
AbstractIn classic audiovisual bounce inducing effect (ABE) demonstrations, the perceptual interpretation of two identical objects moving along the azimuth with uniform motion and towards opposite directions is bistable and depends on whether a sound is presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects’ motion trajectories. The mechanistic basis of the ABE is poorly understood. Here, we sought to characterize the mechanisms underlying the ABE in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we tested the effects of altering visual motion dynamics on bounce vs stream perceptual interpretations by presenting observers with events where the two discs moved with uniform rectilinear motion, acceleration, or deceleration. Sound was presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects or was absent, and object motion was varied (i.e., upwards or downwards). We found that motion dynamics acted to shift perceptual interpretations such that events with downwards accelerating visual motion were more likely to be interpreted as a ‘bounce’ event relative to those with uniform motion and decelerating motion. Curiously, there were no differences in perceptual interpretations between the three motion dynamics when stimuli moved in the upwards direction. In Experiment 2, we presented identical stimuli (downwards only) to observers while measuring functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses concurrently with behaviour in a 3T scanner. We found that events with accelerating- and to a lesser extent, decelerating motion, elicited stronger responses in a number of cortico-vestibular regions, including the posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and the posterior insula, as compared to events containing uniform motion. Notably, responses in these regions also varied depending on perceptual interpretation (i.e., bounce vs stream). Our data suggest that the origins of the ABE extend beyond simple attentional mechanisms as commonly put forth and involves vestibular engagement.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306564
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.004
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.126

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, HFD-
dc.contributor.authorThinnes, D-
dc.contributor.authorAu, PY-
dc.contributor.authorMaziero, D-
dc.contributor.authorStenger, VA-
dc.contributor.authorSinnett, S-
dc.contributor.authorVibell, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-22T07:36:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-22T07:36:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citation20th Vision Sciences Society (VSS) Annual Meeting, Virtual Meeting, 19-24 June 2020. In Journal of Vision, 2020, v. 20 n. 11, abstract no. 953-
dc.identifier.issn1534-7362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306564-
dc.description.abstractIn classic audiovisual bounce inducing effect (ABE) demonstrations, the perceptual interpretation of two identical objects moving along the azimuth with uniform motion and towards opposite directions is bistable and depends on whether a sound is presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects’ motion trajectories. The mechanistic basis of the ABE is poorly understood. Here, we sought to characterize the mechanisms underlying the ABE in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we tested the effects of altering visual motion dynamics on bounce vs stream perceptual interpretations by presenting observers with events where the two discs moved with uniform rectilinear motion, acceleration, or deceleration. Sound was presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects or was absent, and object motion was varied (i.e., upwards or downwards). We found that motion dynamics acted to shift perceptual interpretations such that events with downwards accelerating visual motion were more likely to be interpreted as a ‘bounce’ event relative to those with uniform motion and decelerating motion. Curiously, there were no differences in perceptual interpretations between the three motion dynamics when stimuli moved in the upwards direction. In Experiment 2, we presented identical stimuli (downwards only) to observers while measuring functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses concurrently with behaviour in a 3T scanner. We found that events with accelerating- and to a lesser extent, decelerating motion, elicited stronger responses in a number of cortico-vestibular regions, including the posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and the posterior insula, as compared to events containing uniform motion. Notably, responses in these regions also varied depending on perceptual interpretation (i.e., bounce vs stream). Our data suggest that the origins of the ABE extend beyond simple attentional mechanisms as commonly put forth and involves vestibular engagement.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vision-
dc.relation.ispartof20th Vision Sciences Society (VSS) Annual Meeting, 2020-
dc.titleBounce or stream? Motion dynamics modulate the audiovisual bounce inducing effect-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChang, HFD: changd@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, HFD=rp02272-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/jov.20.11.953-
dc.identifier.hkuros329138-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats