File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Second language writing instructors’ feedback practice in response to automated writing evaluation: A sociocultural perspective

TitleSecond language writing instructors’ feedback practice in response to automated writing evaluation: A sociocultural perspective
Authors
KeywordsAutomated writing evaluation
Mediated learning experience
L2 writing
Teacher feedback
Issue Date2020
Citation
System, 2020, v. 93, article no. 102302 How to Cite?
AbstractWhile automated writing evaluation (AWE) programs are becoming a readily available pedagogic option for second language (L2) writing instructors, the important question of whether the use of AWE would impact teacher feedback remains largely unexplored. This study investigated teacher feedback practices in response to the adoption of AWE in a mainstream L2 curriculum in China. Informed by the mediated learning experience (MLE) theory and drawing upon semi-structured interviews, responses to a questionnaire, classroom observations, and AWE records, this study observed that the impact of AWE was manifested in changes not only in feedback mode, amount, types and levels, but also in the intentionality, reciprocity, transcendence, and meaning dimensions of teacher feedback. The findings also show that such impact was further mediated by individual teacher beliefs about AWE and students, teacher willingness to offer scaffolding and contextual factors. This study suggests that with teacher and contextual supports, AWE systems can be taken as important sociocultural artifacts mediating the integration of MLE as a new object of teacher feedback activity in writing classrooms. These findings call for attention to how more transformative teacher feedback can be promoted with the use of AWE.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303692
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.518
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.422
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Lianjiang-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Shulin-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chuang-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T08:25:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-15T08:25:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationSystem, 2020, v. 93, article no. 102302-
dc.identifier.issn0346-251X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303692-
dc.description.abstractWhile automated writing evaluation (AWE) programs are becoming a readily available pedagogic option for second language (L2) writing instructors, the important question of whether the use of AWE would impact teacher feedback remains largely unexplored. This study investigated teacher feedback practices in response to the adoption of AWE in a mainstream L2 curriculum in China. Informed by the mediated learning experience (MLE) theory and drawing upon semi-structured interviews, responses to a questionnaire, classroom observations, and AWE records, this study observed that the impact of AWE was manifested in changes not only in feedback mode, amount, types and levels, but also in the intentionality, reciprocity, transcendence, and meaning dimensions of teacher feedback. The findings also show that such impact was further mediated by individual teacher beliefs about AWE and students, teacher willingness to offer scaffolding and contextual factors. This study suggests that with teacher and contextual supports, AWE systems can be taken as important sociocultural artifacts mediating the integration of MLE as a new object of teacher feedback activity in writing classrooms. These findings call for attention to how more transformative teacher feedback can be promoted with the use of AWE.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSystem-
dc.subjectAutomated writing evaluation-
dc.subjectMediated learning experience-
dc.subjectL2 writing-
dc.subjectTeacher feedback-
dc.titleSecond language writing instructors’ feedback practice in response to automated writing evaluation: A sociocultural perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.system.2020.102302-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85090053060-
dc.identifier.volume93-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 102302-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 102302-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000566694900002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats