File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Forgetting positive social feedback is difficult: ERP evidence in a directed forgetting paradigm

TitleForgetting positive social feedback is difficult: ERP evidence in a directed forgetting paradigm
Authors
Keywordsaffect misattribution procedure
directed forgetting
event-related potential
social acceptance
social evaluation
Issue Date2021
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0048-5772
Citation
Psychophysiology, 2021, v. 58 n. 5, p. article no. e13790 How to Cite?
AbstractVoluntary forgetting of unwanted memories is an adaptive cognitive function. However, it remains unknown how voluntary forgetting of unwanted social feedback may influence subsequent memories and evaluations, and what the underlying neurocognitive processes are. Here, we presented participants with peer photos together with feedback indicating social acceptance or rejection, followed by “remember” or “forget” instructive cues, while electroencephalograms were recorded during the experiment. We examined the Directed Forgetting (DF) effect in a recognition memory test, and tested participants' explicit and implicit attitudes toward the peers using a social evaluation task and an affect misattribution procedure (AMP). Both the memory test and the AMP were examined immediately and 3 days after the DF task so to estimate both the instant and the long-term effects of memory control. Behaviorally, immediate memory test showed smaller DF effect for positive than negative social feedback, which suggests that forgetting positive social feedback was more difficult than forgetting negative social feedback. Regarding the ERP results, although participants showed comparable frontal N2 amplitudes (reflecting inhibitory control efforts) following the instruction of forgetting positive and negative social feedback, positive feedback elicited larger late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than negative feedback during initial encoding phase, suggesting an encoding bias for positive self-relevant information. Intriguingly, voluntary efforts to forget negative social feedback enhanced people's explicit and implicit evaluations toward the feedback senders. These findings provide new evidence for the adaptive function of memory control, which broadens the influence of voluntary forgetting in the context of social interaction and social evaluation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301913
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.348
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.661
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXIE, H-
dc.contributor.authorHu, X-
dc.contributor.authorMo, L-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, D-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-21T03:28:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-21T03:28:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPsychophysiology, 2021, v. 58 n. 5, p. article no. e13790-
dc.identifier.issn0048-5772-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301913-
dc.description.abstractVoluntary forgetting of unwanted memories is an adaptive cognitive function. However, it remains unknown how voluntary forgetting of unwanted social feedback may influence subsequent memories and evaluations, and what the underlying neurocognitive processes are. Here, we presented participants with peer photos together with feedback indicating social acceptance or rejection, followed by “remember” or “forget” instructive cues, while electroencephalograms were recorded during the experiment. We examined the Directed Forgetting (DF) effect in a recognition memory test, and tested participants' explicit and implicit attitudes toward the peers using a social evaluation task and an affect misattribution procedure (AMP). Both the memory test and the AMP were examined immediately and 3 days after the DF task so to estimate both the instant and the long-term effects of memory control. Behaviorally, immediate memory test showed smaller DF effect for positive than negative social feedback, which suggests that forgetting positive social feedback was more difficult than forgetting negative social feedback. Regarding the ERP results, although participants showed comparable frontal N2 amplitudes (reflecting inhibitory control efforts) following the instruction of forgetting positive and negative social feedback, positive feedback elicited larger late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than negative feedback during initial encoding phase, suggesting an encoding bias for positive self-relevant information. Intriguingly, voluntary efforts to forget negative social feedback enhanced people's explicit and implicit evaluations toward the feedback senders. These findings provide new evidence for the adaptive function of memory control, which broadens the influence of voluntary forgetting in the context of social interaction and social evaluation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0048-5772-
dc.relation.ispartofPsychophysiology-
dc.rightsSubmitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectaffect misattribution procedure-
dc.subjectdirected forgetting-
dc.subjectevent-related potential-
dc.subjectsocial acceptance-
dc.subjectsocial evaluation-
dc.titleForgetting positive social feedback is difficult: ERP evidence in a directed forgetting paradigm-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHu, X: xqhu2716@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHu, X=rp02182-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/psyp.13790-
dc.identifier.pmid33569800-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85101042904-
dc.identifier.hkuros324227-
dc.identifier.volume58-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e13790-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e13790-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000616727400001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats