File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predictive value of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus

TitlePredictive value of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus
Authors
KeywordsBlood pressure variability
Coronary artery disease
Risk prediction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Issue Date2021
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cardiab.com/
Citation
Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2021, v. 20, article no. 88 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has recently been shown to predict cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the predictive value of BPV for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Patients with stable CAD were enrolled and monitored for new MACE. Visit-to-visit BPV was defined as the coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic BP across clinic visits. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of BPV with MACE. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess its predictive ability. Results: Among 1140 Chinese patients with stable CAD, 192 (17%) experienced a new MACE. In multivariable analyses, the risk of MACE was significantly associated with CV of systolic BP (odds ratio [OR] for highest versus lowest quartile, 3.30; 95% CI 1.97–5.54), and diastolic BP (OR for highest versus lowest quartile, 2.39; 95% CI 1.39–4.11), after adjustment for variables of the risk factor model (age, gender, T2DM, hypertension, antihypertensive agents, number of BP measurements) and mean BP. The risk factor model had an AUC of 0.70 for prediction of MACE. Adding systolic/diastolic CV into the risk factor model with mean BP significantly increased the AUC to 0.73/0.72 (P = 0.002/0.007). In subgroup analyses, higher CV of systolic BP remained significantly associated with an increased risk for MACE in patients with and without T2DM, whereas the association of CV of diastolic BP with MACE was observed only in those without T2DM. Conclusions: Visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and of diastolic BP was an independent predictor of new MACE and provided incremental prognostic value beyond mean BP and conventional risk factors in patients with stable CAD. The association of BPV in CAD patients without T2DM with subsequent risk for MACE was stronger than in those with T2DM.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301274
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.621
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, YK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, YH-
dc.contributor.authorHai, JSH-
dc.contributor.authorLau, KK-
dc.contributor.authorTse, HF-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T08:08:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-27T08:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCardiovascular Diabetology, 2021, v. 20, article no. 88-
dc.identifier.issn1475-2840-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301274-
dc.description.abstractBackground: High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has recently been shown to predict cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the predictive value of BPV for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Patients with stable CAD were enrolled and monitored for new MACE. Visit-to-visit BPV was defined as the coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic BP across clinic visits. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of BPV with MACE. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess its predictive ability. Results: Among 1140 Chinese patients with stable CAD, 192 (17%) experienced a new MACE. In multivariable analyses, the risk of MACE was significantly associated with CV of systolic BP (odds ratio [OR] for highest versus lowest quartile, 3.30; 95% CI 1.97–5.54), and diastolic BP (OR for highest versus lowest quartile, 2.39; 95% CI 1.39–4.11), after adjustment for variables of the risk factor model (age, gender, T2DM, hypertension, antihypertensive agents, number of BP measurements) and mean BP. The risk factor model had an AUC of 0.70 for prediction of MACE. Adding systolic/diastolic CV into the risk factor model with mean BP significantly increased the AUC to 0.73/0.72 (P = 0.002/0.007). In subgroup analyses, higher CV of systolic BP remained significantly associated with an increased risk for MACE in patients with and without T2DM, whereas the association of CV of diastolic BP with MACE was observed only in those without T2DM. Conclusions: Visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and of diastolic BP was an independent predictor of new MACE and provided incremental prognostic value beyond mean BP and conventional risk factors in patients with stable CAD. The association of BPV in CAD patients without T2DM with subsequent risk for MACE was stronger than in those with T2DM.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cardiab.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofCardiovascular Diabetology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBlood pressure variability-
dc.subjectCoronary artery disease-
dc.subjectRisk prediction-
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes mellitus-
dc.titlePredictive value of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, YK: debbieyk@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHai, JSH: haishjj@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLau, KK: gkklau@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTse, HF: hftse@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHai, JSH=rp02047-
dc.identifier.authorityLau, KK=rp01499-
dc.identifier.authorityTse, HF=rp00428-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12933-021-01280-z-
dc.identifier.pmid33894788-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8070286-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85104882799-
dc.identifier.hkuros323648-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 88-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 88-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000643237000004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats