File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Participation, Representative Democracy, and the Courts

TitleParticipation, Representative Democracy, and the Courts
Authors
KeywordsDemocracy
Courts
Standing to sue
Rights
Judicialization
Public interest litigation
Issue Date2003
PublisherOxford University Press.
Citation
Participation, Representative Democracy, and the Courts. In Cain, BE, Dalton, RJ, and Scarrow, SE (Eds.), Democracy Transformed?: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, p. 192-222. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 How to Cite?
AbstractThis analysis examines the relationship between representative democracy and courts. In particular, it asks to what extent can citizens activate judicial institutions to pursue more diffuse public policy issues and whether this use has grown over time? To assess this change, cross-national variations in three institutional variables: separation of powers, judicially enforceable rights, and rules governing standing to sue state authorities, are examined. The findings reveal increasing levels of public interest litigation around the globe that has led to a creeping judicialization of policy-making.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300184
ISBN
Series/Report no.Comparative Politics

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCichowski, RA-
dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, A-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationParticipation, Representative Democracy, and the Courts. In Cain, BE, Dalton, RJ, and Scarrow, SE (Eds.), Democracy Transformed?: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, p. 192-222. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003-
dc.identifier.isbn9780199264995-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300184-
dc.description.abstractThis analysis examines the relationship between representative democracy and courts. In particular, it asks to what extent can citizens activate judicial institutions to pursue more diffuse public policy issues and whether this use has grown over time? To assess this change, cross-national variations in three institutional variables: separation of powers, judicially enforceable rights, and rules governing standing to sue state authorities, are examined. The findings reveal increasing levels of public interest litigation around the globe that has led to a creeping judicialization of policy-making.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press.-
dc.relation.ispartofDemocracy Transformed?: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Politics-
dc.subjectDemocracy-
dc.subjectCourts-
dc.subjectStanding to sue-
dc.subjectRights-
dc.subjectJudicialization-
dc.subjectPublic interest litigation-
dc.titleParticipation, Representative Democracy, and the Courts-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/0199264996.003.0009-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84921893038-
dc.identifier.spage192-
dc.identifier.epage222-
dc.publisher.placeOxford-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats