File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China

TitleHow does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China
Authors
KeywordsDiDi
Ridesourcing
Public transit
Complementary
Substitution
Issue Date2020
Citation
Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, v. 86, article no. 102769 How to Cite?
AbstractThe explosive growth of ridesourcing services has stimulated a debate on whether they represent a net substitute for or a complement to public transit. Among the empirical evidence that supports discussion of the net effect at the city level, analysis at the disaggregated level from a geospatial perspective is lacking. Besides, it remains unexplored the spatiotemporal pattern of ridesourcing's effect on public transit, and the factors that impact the effect. Using DiDi Chuxing data in Chengdu, China, this paper develops a three-level structure to recognize the potential substitution or complementary effects of ridesourcing on public transit. Furthermore, this paper investigates the effects through exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis, and examines the factors influencing the degree of substitution via linear, spatial autoregressive, and zero-inflated beta regression models. The results show that 33.1% of DiDi trips have the potential to substitute for public transit. The substitution rate is higher during the day (8:00–18:00), and the trend follows changes in public transit coverage. The substitution effect is more exhibited in the city center and the areas covered by the subway, while the complementary effect is more exhibited in suburban areas as public transit has poor coverage. Further examination of the factors impacting the relationship indicates that housing price is positively associated with the substitution rate, and distance to the nearest subway station has a negative association with it, while the effects of most built environment factors become insignificant in zero-inflated beta regression. Based on these findings, policy implications are drawn regarding the partnership between transit agencies and ridesourcing companies, the spatial-differentiated policies in the central and suburban areas, and the potential problems in providing ridesourcing service to the economically disadvantaged population.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300133
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.899
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.809
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKong, Hui-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaohu-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jinhua-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:07Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Transport Geography, 2020, v. 86, article no. 102769-
dc.identifier.issn0966-6923-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300133-
dc.description.abstractThe explosive growth of ridesourcing services has stimulated a debate on whether they represent a net substitute for or a complement to public transit. Among the empirical evidence that supports discussion of the net effect at the city level, analysis at the disaggregated level from a geospatial perspective is lacking. Besides, it remains unexplored the spatiotemporal pattern of ridesourcing's effect on public transit, and the factors that impact the effect. Using DiDi Chuxing data in Chengdu, China, this paper develops a three-level structure to recognize the potential substitution or complementary effects of ridesourcing on public transit. Furthermore, this paper investigates the effects through exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis, and examines the factors influencing the degree of substitution via linear, spatial autoregressive, and zero-inflated beta regression models. The results show that 33.1% of DiDi trips have the potential to substitute for public transit. The substitution rate is higher during the day (8:00–18:00), and the trend follows changes in public transit coverage. The substitution effect is more exhibited in the city center and the areas covered by the subway, while the complementary effect is more exhibited in suburban areas as public transit has poor coverage. Further examination of the factors impacting the relationship indicates that housing price is positively associated with the substitution rate, and distance to the nearest subway station has a negative association with it, while the effects of most built environment factors become insignificant in zero-inflated beta regression. Based on these findings, policy implications are drawn regarding the partnership between transit agencies and ridesourcing companies, the spatial-differentiated policies in the central and suburban areas, and the potential problems in providing ridesourcing service to the economically disadvantaged population.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Transport Geography-
dc.subjectDiDi-
dc.subjectRidesourcing-
dc.subjectPublic transit-
dc.subjectComplementary-
dc.subjectSubstitution-
dc.titleHow does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102769-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85086763233-
dc.identifier.volume86-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 102769-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 102769-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000552054200005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats