File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Comparison of multiple Chinese earth observation data for urban land use classification with different classification methods

TitleComparison of multiple Chinese earth observation data for urban land use classification with different classification methods
Authors
Issue Date2010
Citation
European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP, 2010, v. 684 SP How to Cite?
AbstractIt still remains unsolved that to what extent the Chinese satellite data sources can be used to substitute each other in land use and land cover mapping and change analysis. We compared three Chinese land observation data sources (CBERS-02B, BEIJING-1 and HJ-1B) for urban land use classification using five classification algorithms including minimum distance classification (MDC), maximum likelihood classification (MLC), neural network classification (NN), support vector machines (VCMs) and decision trees (DTs). Our results show: the MLC and SVMs can achieve good results for CBERS-02B data; DTs and SVMs can achieve good results for BEIJING-1 data; The SVMs and MLC can achieve good results for HJ-1B data. BEIJING-1 data led to superior results to the other two data sources when classified just based on spectral information.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296675
ISSN
2019 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.146

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Congcong-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Lu-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Fangdi-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lei-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:25Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP, 2010, v. 684 SP-
dc.identifier.issn0379-6566-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296675-
dc.description.abstractIt still remains unsolved that to what extent the Chinese satellite data sources can be used to substitute each other in land use and land cover mapping and change analysis. We compared three Chinese land observation data sources (CBERS-02B, BEIJING-1 and HJ-1B) for urban land use classification using five classification algorithms including minimum distance classification (MDC), maximum likelihood classification (MLC), neural network classification (NN), support vector machines (VCMs) and decision trees (DTs). Our results show: the MLC and SVMs can achieve good results for CBERS-02B data; DTs and SVMs can achieve good results for BEIJING-1 data; The SVMs and MLC can achieve good results for HJ-1B data. BEIJING-1 data led to superior results to the other two data sources when classified just based on spectral information.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP-
dc.titleComparison of multiple Chinese earth observation data for urban land use classification with different classification methods-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79851479685-
dc.identifier.volume684 SP-
dc.identifier.issnl0379-6566-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats