File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Lacrimal sac bacteriology and susceptibility pattern in infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the 1st year of life: a cross-sectional study

TitleLacrimal sac bacteriology and susceptibility pattern in infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the 1st year of life: a cross-sectional study
Authors
KeywordsCongenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Infant
Microbiology
Lacrimal sac
Levofloxacin
Issue Date2020
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpediatr/
Citation
BMC Pediatrics, 2020, v. 20 n. 1, p. article no. 465 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is one of the main causes of epiphora in infants, and antibiotics are usually used as a conservative therapy in the first year. Yet, little is known about the bacteriology of the occluded lacrimal drainage system in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbiology of lacrimal sac (LS) in Chinese children with CNLDO in their first year of life. Methods: Patients with CNLDO between May 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018 at a tertiary care children’s hospital were enrolled. The study recruited infants who received lacrimal probing under 1 year old, and refluxed discharge from LS was collected. Samples were cultured and susceptibility test was performed for positive culture. Results: Thirty-two patients with CNLDO were included. The ratio of male to female was 23:9. The mean age was 6.7 ± 2.4 (1.7–12) months. Positive cultures was identified in 87.5% of the sample, and presented 38 strains of bacteria. Mixed infection was identified in 10 (31.3%) children. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 60.5% of all the strains, with Streptococcus (50%) being the most frequent species, whereas Haemophilus (21.1%) and Neisseriae (13.2%) were most common isolates for Gram-negative organisms. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was detected in 2 infants whose symptoms resolved by a routine probing. No difference of bacteriology pattern was detected between patients under 6 months old and those beyond. The pathogens were highly sensitive to chloramphenicol (88%) and levofloxacin (84%), but resistant to erythromycin (40%) and sulfamethoxazole (32%). Conclusions: Infants with CNLDO under 1 year of age presented predominance of Streptococcus as Gram-positive organism, and Haemophilus as Gram-negative organism. Levofloxacin was an active topical antibiotic agent with few chance of resistance especially for Chinese children. These findings could help clinicians choose optimal medicine for CNLDO as the conservative treatments.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293207
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.567
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.806
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, XY-
dc.contributor.authorChoy, BNK-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, MM-
dc.contributor.authorShi, CP-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, ZY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:13:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:13:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pediatrics, 2020, v. 20 n. 1, p. article no. 465-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2431-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293207-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is one of the main causes of epiphora in infants, and antibiotics are usually used as a conservative therapy in the first year. Yet, little is known about the bacteriology of the occluded lacrimal drainage system in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbiology of lacrimal sac (LS) in Chinese children with CNLDO in their first year of life. Methods: Patients with CNLDO between May 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018 at a tertiary care children’s hospital were enrolled. The study recruited infants who received lacrimal probing under 1 year old, and refluxed discharge from LS was collected. Samples were cultured and susceptibility test was performed for positive culture. Results: Thirty-two patients with CNLDO were included. The ratio of male to female was 23:9. The mean age was 6.7 ± 2.4 (1.7–12) months. Positive cultures was identified in 87.5% of the sample, and presented 38 strains of bacteria. Mixed infection was identified in 10 (31.3%) children. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 60.5% of all the strains, with Streptococcus (50%) being the most frequent species, whereas Haemophilus (21.1%) and Neisseriae (13.2%) were most common isolates for Gram-negative organisms. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was detected in 2 infants whose symptoms resolved by a routine probing. No difference of bacteriology pattern was detected between patients under 6 months old and those beyond. The pathogens were highly sensitive to chloramphenicol (88%) and levofloxacin (84%), but resistant to erythromycin (40%) and sulfamethoxazole (32%). Conclusions: Infants with CNLDO under 1 year of age presented predominance of Streptococcus as Gram-positive organism, and Haemophilus as Gram-negative organism. Levofloxacin was an active topical antibiotic agent with few chance of resistance especially for Chinese children. These findings could help clinicians choose optimal medicine for CNLDO as the conservative treatments.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpediatr/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pediatrics-
dc.rightsBMC Pediatrics. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCongenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction-
dc.subjectInfant-
dc.subjectMicrobiology-
dc.subjectLacrimal sac-
dc.subjectLevofloxacin-
dc.titleLacrimal sac bacteriology and susceptibility pattern in infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the 1st year of life: a cross-sectional study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChoy, BNK: bnkchoy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChoy, BNK=rp01795-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12887-020-02358-5-
dc.identifier.pmid33023519-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7539386-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85092459031-
dc.identifier.hkuros320162-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 465-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 465-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000578260900001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-2431-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats