File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Aging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures

TitleAging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures
Authors
Keywordsotolith
Gasterosteus aculeatus
gill cover
pelvic spine
repeatability
age
Issue Date2019
Citation
Journal of Fish Biology, 2019, v. 95, n. 3, p. 802-811 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles In order to assess the accuracy and reliability of age estimates from calcified structures in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus, we evaluated intra and inter-reader repeatability from three structures: otoliths, gill covers and pelvic spines). Average age estimates were also compared between the structures. The overall intra-reader repeatability of age estimates were highest for otoliths (69%), lowest for gill covers (53%) and intermediate for spine cross-sections (63%). Although four of the seven readers had the highest intra-reader repeatability score for spine cross-sections, the inter-reader variance in this structure was much higher than in others. Otoliths were the easiest in terms of their pre-analysis treatment and exchange of materials (as digital images) between readers. In addition, otoliths are more well-studied compared with the other structures with respect to their development through ontogenesis; hence, age estimates based on otoliths should be the most reliable. Therefore, our recommendation is that whenever possible, analysis of otoliths should be the preferred approach for aging G. aculeatus.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292117
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.504
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.672
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYurtseva, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.authorNoreikiene, Kristina-
dc.contributor.authorLajus, Dmitry-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zitong-
dc.contributor.authorAlapassi, Tarja-
dc.contributor.authorIvanova, Tatiana-
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, Mikhail-
dc.contributor.authorGolovin, Pavel-
dc.contributor.authorVesala, Sami-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Fish Biology, 2019, v. 95, n. 3, p. 802-811-
dc.identifier.issn0022-1112-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292117-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles In order to assess the accuracy and reliability of age estimates from calcified structures in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus, we evaluated intra and inter-reader repeatability from three structures: otoliths, gill covers and pelvic spines). Average age estimates were also compared between the structures. The overall intra-reader repeatability of age estimates were highest for otoliths (69%), lowest for gill covers (53%) and intermediate for spine cross-sections (63%). Although four of the seven readers had the highest intra-reader repeatability score for spine cross-sections, the inter-reader variance in this structure was much higher than in others. Otoliths were the easiest in terms of their pre-analysis treatment and exchange of materials (as digital images) between readers. In addition, otoliths are more well-studied compared with the other structures with respect to their development through ontogenesis; hence, age estimates based on otoliths should be the most reliable. Therefore, our recommendation is that whenever possible, analysis of otoliths should be the preferred approach for aging G. aculeatus.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Fish Biology-
dc.subjectotolith-
dc.subjectGasterosteus aculeatus-
dc.subjectgill cover-
dc.subjectpelvic spine-
dc.subjectrepeatability-
dc.subjectage-
dc.titleAging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jfb.14071-
dc.identifier.pmid31192469-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85068142926-
dc.identifier.volume95-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage802-
dc.identifier.epage811-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8649-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000508353600009-
dc.identifier.issnl0022-1112-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats