File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Natural Language Input: Maternal Education, Socioeconomic Deprivation, and Language Outcomes in Typically Developing Children

TitleNatural Language Input: Maternal Education, Socioeconomic Deprivation, and Language Outcomes in Typically Developing Children
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherAmerican Speech - Language - Hearing Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.asha.org/about/publications/journal-abstracts/lshss-a/
Citation
Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 2020, v. 51 n. 4, p. 1049-1070 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The current study was designed to investigate the differences in language input related to family factors (maternal level of education [MLE] and socioeconomic level of deprivation [SLD]) and their association with language outcomes in preschoolers. Method: This study used New Zealand SLD and MLE classification systems to examine differences in language input related to these factors among 20 typically developing preschool children aged 2–5 years. The quantity of children's language input (adult words [AWs], conversational turns [CTs]) was calculated using the Language ENvironment Analysis audiotaping technology for two typical weekend days. Four 5-min Language ENvironment Analysis recording segments were transcribed and coded, and parental language strategies were classified as optimal language strategy, moderate language strategy, or sub-optimal language strategy (S-OLS) for child language outcomes. The receptive and expressive language of each child was assessed using the Preschool Language Scales–Fifth Edition. Results: Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences between the quantity of language input (AWs/hr, CTs/hr) for high and low MLE and high and low SLD groups. Consistent with the literature, the use of S-OLSs was significantly lower for families with high MLE (Mdn = .25, IQR = .14) and low SLD (Mdn = .22, IQR = .13) than for families with low MLE (Mdn = .41, IQR = .24) and high SLD (Mdn = .41, IQR = .26). Spearman correlation coefficients indicated significant associations between language input (AWs/hr, CTs/hr, S-OLSs) and language outcomes. Conclusions: Reduced language input and the frequent use of S-OLSs associated with low maternal education and high deprivation and low language outcomes for these children highlight the importance for all parents/families to learn optimal language strategies to support the development of strong language skills in their children in young age.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290685
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.215
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.097
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSultana, N-
dc.contributor.authorWong, LLN-
dc.contributor.authorPrudy, SC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T05:45:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T05:45:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationLanguage, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 2020, v. 51 n. 4, p. 1049-1070-
dc.identifier.issn0161-1461-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290685-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The current study was designed to investigate the differences in language input related to family factors (maternal level of education [MLE] and socioeconomic level of deprivation [SLD]) and their association with language outcomes in preschoolers. Method: This study used New Zealand SLD and MLE classification systems to examine differences in language input related to these factors among 20 typically developing preschool children aged 2–5 years. The quantity of children's language input (adult words [AWs], conversational turns [CTs]) was calculated using the Language ENvironment Analysis audiotaping technology for two typical weekend days. Four 5-min Language ENvironment Analysis recording segments were transcribed and coded, and parental language strategies were classified as optimal language strategy, moderate language strategy, or sub-optimal language strategy (S-OLS) for child language outcomes. The receptive and expressive language of each child was assessed using the Preschool Language Scales–Fifth Edition. Results: Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences between the quantity of language input (AWs/hr, CTs/hr) for high and low MLE and high and low SLD groups. Consistent with the literature, the use of S-OLSs was significantly lower for families with high MLE (Mdn = .25, IQR = .14) and low SLD (Mdn = .22, IQR = .13) than for families with low MLE (Mdn = .41, IQR = .24) and high SLD (Mdn = .41, IQR = .26). Spearman correlation coefficients indicated significant associations between language input (AWs/hr, CTs/hr, S-OLSs) and language outcomes. Conclusions: Reduced language input and the frequent use of S-OLSs associated with low maternal education and high deprivation and low language outcomes for these children highlight the importance for all parents/families to learn optimal language strategies to support the development of strong language skills in their children in young age.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Speech - Language - Hearing Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.asha.org/about/publications/journal-abstracts/lshss-a/-
dc.relation.ispartofLanguage, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools-
dc.titleNatural Language Input: Maternal Education, Socioeconomic Deprivation, and Language Outcomes in Typically Developing Children-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, LLN: llnwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, LLN=rp00975-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00095-
dc.identifier.pmid32755504-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85092047722-
dc.identifier.hkuros318374-
dc.identifier.volume51-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1049-
dc.identifier.epage1070-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000577157700011-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0161-1461-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats