File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Lead-time bias in esophageal cancer screening in high-risk areas in China

TitleLead-time bias in esophageal cancer screening in high-risk areas in China
Authors
KeywordsEsophageal cancer
lead-time bias
length bias
screening
simulation model
Issue Date2020
PublisherChinese Anti-Cancer Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://cjcr.amegroups.com/
Citation
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2020, v. 32 n. 4, p. 467-475 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To investigate what extent lead-time bias is likely to affect endoscopic screening effectiveness for esophageal cancer in the high-risk area in China. Methods: A screening model based on the epidemiological cancer registry data, yielding a population-level incidence and mortality rates, was carried out to simulate study participants in the high-risk area in China, and investigate the effect of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening with control for length bias. Results: Of 100,000 participants, 6,150 (6.15%) were diagnosed with esophageal squamous dysplasia during the 20-year follow-up period. The estimated lead time ranged from 1.67 to 5.78 years, with a median time of 4.62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 4.07-5.11 years] in the high-risk area in China. Lead-time bias exaggerated screening effectiveness severely, causing more than a 10% overestimation in 5-year cause-specific survival rate and around a 43 % reduction in cause-specific hazard ratio. The magnitude of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer varied depending on the screening strategies, in which an inverted U-shaped and U-shaped effects were observed in the 5-year cause-specific survival rate and cause-specific hazard ratio respectively concerning a range of ages for primary screening. Conclusions: Lead-time bias, usually causing an overestimation of screening effectiveness, is an elementary and fundamental issue in cancer screening. Quantification and correction of lead-time bias are essential when evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic screening in the high-risk area in China.
DescriptionWOS:000565117000004
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290004
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.026
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYANG, Z-
dc.contributor.authorWong, IOL-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, W-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, R-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J-
dc.contributor.authorWei, W-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:20:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:20:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationChinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2020, v. 32 n. 4, p. 467-475-
dc.identifier.issn1000-9604-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290004-
dc.descriptionWOS:000565117000004-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate what extent lead-time bias is likely to affect endoscopic screening effectiveness for esophageal cancer in the high-risk area in China. Methods: A screening model based on the epidemiological cancer registry data, yielding a population-level incidence and mortality rates, was carried out to simulate study participants in the high-risk area in China, and investigate the effect of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening with control for length bias. Results: Of 100,000 participants, 6,150 (6.15%) were diagnosed with esophageal squamous dysplasia during the 20-year follow-up period. The estimated lead time ranged from 1.67 to 5.78 years, with a median time of 4.62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 4.07-5.11 years] in the high-risk area in China. Lead-time bias exaggerated screening effectiveness severely, causing more than a 10% overestimation in 5-year cause-specific survival rate and around a 43 % reduction in cause-specific hazard ratio. The magnitude of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer varied depending on the screening strategies, in which an inverted U-shaped and U-shaped effects were observed in the 5-year cause-specific survival rate and cause-specific hazard ratio respectively concerning a range of ages for primary screening. Conclusions: Lead-time bias, usually causing an overestimation of screening effectiveness, is an elementary and fundamental issue in cancer screening. Quantification and correction of lead-time bias are essential when evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic screening in the high-risk area in China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherChinese Anti-Cancer Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://cjcr.amegroups.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal of Cancer Research-
dc.subjectEsophageal cancer-
dc.subjectlead-time bias-
dc.subjectlength bias-
dc.subjectscreening-
dc.subjectsimulation model-
dc.titleLead-time bias in esophageal cancer screening in high-risk areas in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, IOL: iolwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, IOL=rp01806-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.04.04-
dc.identifier.hkuros316289-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage467-
dc.identifier.epage475-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000565117000004-
dc.publisher.placeChina-
dc.identifier.issnl1000-9604-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats