File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cognitive assessment and rehabilitation tools for stroke and dementia: An online survey of Russian speaking clinicians

TitleCognitive assessment and rehabilitation tools for stroke and dementia: An online survey of Russian speaking clinicians
Authors
KeywordsCognitive assessment
cognitive rehabilitation
dementia
stroke
survey
Issue Date2020
PublisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hapn21/21/2#.U42cG7ESDGg
Citation
Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 2020, Epub 2020-04-16 How to Cite?
AbstractOur objective was to survey opinions on cognitive assessment and rehabilitation of Russian-speaking clinicians working with stroke and dementia patients. An online survey was circulated to professional communities soliciting feedback from clinicians about methods used for cognitive assessment and rehabilitation; expected cognitive impairments in dementia and stroke; variables affecting the cognitive abilities of patients; and topics presented during psycho-educational initiatives. Forty-eight physicians, 50 psychologists, and 12 speech-language pathologists completed the survey. 96% of participants reported estimating the cognitive abilities of patients while performing diagnostics and treatment in clinical settings. The most popular tools for cognitive assessment were Russian versions of the MoCA, MMSE, Luria Neuropsychological Battery, and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). 60% of participants reported the provision of cognitive rehabilitation, and 61% provided psychoeducation. All groups reported that the cognitive reserve and the idiopathic features of a brain lesion were the main factors influencing patients’ cognitive profile. In the case of stroke patients, clinicians observed aphasia, as well as impairments in attention, memory, and reasoning. For patients with dementia, memory deficits were coincident with executive/frontal, praxis, and visuo-perceptual impairments. Psychotherapy-related psychoeducation was delivered by most of the clinicians. The captured patterns of clinical practice followed, in part, Russian national guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation and, in part, international protocols, wherein we found some professional group differences in implementation of practice. The profile in approaches to stroke and dementia assessment and rehabilitation reveal a new benchmark for future studies and for the development of policies for neuropsychological assessment and treatment in Russian language.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289500
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.050
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.494
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShendyapina, M-
dc.contributor.authorSu, IF-
dc.contributor.authorWeekes, B-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:13:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:13:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Neuropsychology: Adult, 2020, Epub 2020-04-16-
dc.identifier.issn2327-9095-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289500-
dc.description.abstractOur objective was to survey opinions on cognitive assessment and rehabilitation of Russian-speaking clinicians working with stroke and dementia patients. An online survey was circulated to professional communities soliciting feedback from clinicians about methods used for cognitive assessment and rehabilitation; expected cognitive impairments in dementia and stroke; variables affecting the cognitive abilities of patients; and topics presented during psycho-educational initiatives. Forty-eight physicians, 50 psychologists, and 12 speech-language pathologists completed the survey. 96% of participants reported estimating the cognitive abilities of patients while performing diagnostics and treatment in clinical settings. The most popular tools for cognitive assessment were Russian versions of the MoCA, MMSE, Luria Neuropsychological Battery, and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). 60% of participants reported the provision of cognitive rehabilitation, and 61% provided psychoeducation. All groups reported that the cognitive reserve and the idiopathic features of a brain lesion were the main factors influencing patients’ cognitive profile. In the case of stroke patients, clinicians observed aphasia, as well as impairments in attention, memory, and reasoning. For patients with dementia, memory deficits were coincident with executive/frontal, praxis, and visuo-perceptual impairments. Psychotherapy-related psychoeducation was delivered by most of the clinicians. The captured patterns of clinical practice followed, in part, Russian national guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation and, in part, international protocols, wherein we found some professional group differences in implementation of practice. The profile in approaches to stroke and dementia assessment and rehabilitation reveal a new benchmark for future studies and for the development of policies for neuropsychological assessment and treatment in Russian language.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hapn21/21/2#.U42cG7ESDGg-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Neuropsychology: Adult-
dc.rightsApplied Neuropsychology: Adult. Copyright © Psychology Press.-
dc.rightsPREPRINT This is a preprint of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in the [JOURNAL TITLE] [year of publication] [copyright Taylor & Francis]; [JOURNAL TITLE] is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ with the open URL of your article POSTPRINT ‘This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the article as published in the print edition of the journal]. [JOURNAL TITLE] is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ with the open URL of your article.-
dc.subjectCognitive assessment-
dc.subjectcognitive rehabilitation-
dc.subjectdementia-
dc.subjectstroke-
dc.subjectsurvey-
dc.titleCognitive assessment and rehabilitation tools for stroke and dementia: An online survey of Russian speaking clinicians-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSu, IF: ifansu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWeekes, B: weekes@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySu, IF=rp01650-
dc.identifier.authorityWeekes, B=rp01390-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23279095.2020.1748034-
dc.identifier.pmid32298160-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85083650315-
dc.identifier.hkuros316367-
dc.identifier.volumeEpub 2020-04-16-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage20-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000527149600001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl2327-9095-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats