File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants

TitlePolygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants
Authors
KeywordsBRCA1/2
breast cancer
ovarian cancer
PRS
genetics
Issue Date2020
PublisherSpringer Nature for American College of Medical Genetics. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/gim/index.html
Citation
Genetics In Medicine, 2020, v. 22, p. 1653-1666 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Methods: Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort. Results: The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25–1.33], P = 3×10−72). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27–1.36], P = 7×10−50). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25–1.40], P = 3×10−22) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30–1.60], P = 4×10−12) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar. Conclusion: Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284859
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 8.864
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.509
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.contributor.authorGEMO Study Collaborators-
dc.contributor.authorEMBRACE Collaborators-
dc.contributor.authorConsortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA and BRCA2-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:03:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:03:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationGenetics In Medicine, 2020, v. 22, p. 1653-1666-
dc.identifier.issn1098-3600-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284859-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Methods: Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort. Results: The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25–1.33], P = 3×10−72). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27–1.36], P = 7×10−50). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25–1.40], P = 3×10−22) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30–1.60], P = 4×10−12) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar. Conclusion: Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature for American College of Medical Genetics. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/gim/index.html-
dc.relation.ispartofGenetics In Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBRCA1/2-
dc.subjectbreast cancer-
dc.subjectovarian cancer-
dc.subjectPRS-
dc.subjectgenetics-
dc.titlePolygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x-
dc.identifier.pmid32665703-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85091841899-
dc.identifier.hkuros311566-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.spage1653-
dc.identifier.epage1666-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000548481100002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl1098-3600-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats