File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s13244-020-00851-0
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Machine learning re-sampling techniques in imbalanced datasets improve prognostication performance in a multicentre cohort of head and neck cancer patients using a PET-based radiomics model.
Title | Machine learning re-sampling techniques in imbalanced datasets improve prognostication performance in a multicentre cohort of head and neck cancer patients using a PET-based radiomics model. |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | SpringerOpen. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/radiology/journal/13244 |
Citation | European Congress of Radiology (ECR), Vienna, Austria, 15-19 July 2020. Book of Abstracts In Insights into Imaging, 2020, v. 11 n. Suppl. 1, p. 133 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: Achieving good performance on real biomerkcal data that frequently contains imbalance characteristics remains a challenging task. This study aimed to investigate the impact of re-sampling techniques in imbalanced datasets for PET radiomics-based prognostication in head and neck (HNC) cancer patients.
Methods and materials: PET-based radiomics analysis was performed in 166 patients (median age 49.3 years. 77.1% male) diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in our centre and 182 HNC patients from the TCIA database. Conventional PET and 15 robust texture features were extracted for the correlation analysis of overall survival (OS) and disease progression-free survival (DES). We investigated cross-combination of 10 re-sampling methods and 4 classifiers for radiomics-based survival prediction.
Results: Re-samplng techniques including oversampling and hybrid sampling achieved significant improvement on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and prediction of the minority dass in terms of precisions, recalls, and F-measures in both cohorts, as compared to no
oversampling (Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test, p < 0.05). We observed that the combination method ADASYN oversampling*XGboost classifier (AUC of 0.70. accuracy of 0.74. sensitivity of 0.75. and specificity of 0.70) presented the highest performance for DFS prediction. ADASYN+SVM performed best (AUC of 0.80, accuracy of 0.76. sensitivity of 0.74. and specificity of 0.86) for OS prediction in our NPC cohort.
Conclusion: We identified optxnal machine learning methods for the prediction of prognostication in NPC. which enhanced the applications of radiomics in precision oncology and clinical practice. Of note, re-sampling techniques showed a significant positive impact on prediction performance in imbalanced
datasets.
Limitations: Our study is limited by retrospective datasets in terms of relatively small numbers of instances. |
Description | Congress was originally planned for 11-15 March 2020 could not be held, due to Convid-19. The ECR 2020 Online Congress Programme taking place between July 15-19, 2020 Head and Neck- RPS 108: Advanced imaging in head and neck tumours - abstract no. RPS 108-3 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/284666 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.240 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Xie, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, JWK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pang, HMH | - |
dc.contributor.author | DU, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, WHK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, EYP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vardhanabhuti, V | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-07T09:00:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-07T09:00:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Congress of Radiology (ECR), Vienna, Austria, 15-19 July 2020. Book of Abstracts In Insights into Imaging, 2020, v. 11 n. Suppl. 1, p. 133 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1869-4101 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/284666 | - |
dc.description | Congress was originally planned for 11-15 March 2020 could not be held, due to Convid-19. The ECR 2020 Online Congress Programme taking place between July 15-19, 2020 | - |
dc.description | Head and Neck- RPS 108: Advanced imaging in head and neck tumours - abstract no. RPS 108-3 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Achieving good performance on real biomerkcal data that frequently contains imbalance characteristics remains a challenging task. This study aimed to investigate the impact of re-sampling techniques in imbalanced datasets for PET radiomics-based prognostication in head and neck (HNC) cancer patients. Methods and materials: PET-based radiomics analysis was performed in 166 patients (median age 49.3 years. 77.1% male) diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in our centre and 182 HNC patients from the TCIA database. Conventional PET and 15 robust texture features were extracted for the correlation analysis of overall survival (OS) and disease progression-free survival (DES). We investigated cross-combination of 10 re-sampling methods and 4 classifiers for radiomics-based survival prediction. Results: Re-samplng techniques including oversampling and hybrid sampling achieved significant improvement on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and prediction of the minority dass in terms of precisions, recalls, and F-measures in both cohorts, as compared to no oversampling (Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test, p < 0.05). We observed that the combination method ADASYN oversampling*XGboost classifier (AUC of 0.70. accuracy of 0.74. sensitivity of 0.75. and specificity of 0.70) presented the highest performance for DFS prediction. ADASYN+SVM performed best (AUC of 0.80, accuracy of 0.76. sensitivity of 0.74. and specificity of 0.86) for OS prediction in our NPC cohort. Conclusion: We identified optxnal machine learning methods for the prediction of prognostication in NPC. which enhanced the applications of radiomics in precision oncology and clinical practice. Of note, re-sampling techniques showed a significant positive impact on prediction performance in imbalanced datasets. Limitations: Our study is limited by retrospective datasets in terms of relatively small numbers of instances. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | SpringerOpen. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/radiology/journal/13244 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Insights into Imaging | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Congress of Radiology (ECR) | - |
dc.title | Machine learning re-sampling techniques in imbalanced datasets improve prognostication performance in a multicentre cohort of head and neck cancer patients using a PET-based radiomics model. | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, JWK: jwkho@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Pang, HMH: herbpang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chiu, WHK: kwhchiu@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, EYP: eyplee77@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Vardhanabhuti, V: varv@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, JWK=rp02436 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Pang, HMH=rp01857 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chiu, WHK=rp02074 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, EYP=rp01456 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Vardhanabhuti, V=rp01900 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 312614 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | Suppl. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 133 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 133 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Germany | - |
dc.identifier.partofdoi | 10.1186/s13244-020-00851-0 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1869-4101 | - |