File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Most Common Publication Types of Neuroimaging Literature: Papers With High Levels of Evidence Are on the Rise

TitleMost Common Publication Types of Neuroimaging Literature: Papers With High Levels of Evidence Are on the Rise
Authors
Keywordspublication type
neuroimaging
diagnostics
bibliometric
citation distribution
Issue Date2020
PublisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/humanneuroscience/
Citation
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, v. 14, p. article no. 136 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This study evaluated the bibliometric data of the most common publication types of the neuroimaging literature. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify all published papers with “neuroimaging” as their MeSH Major Topics, and they were further searched by the following publication types: case report, clinical trial, comparative study, editorial, evaluation study, guideline, meta-analysis, multicenter study, randomized controlled trial, review, technical report, and validation study. The proportion of papers belonging to each publication type published in neuroimaging journals was calculated. Year-adjusted mean citation counts for each publication type were computed using data from Web of Science. Publication trend and its correlation with citation performance were assessed. Results: Review and comparative study were the most common publication types. Publication types with the highest proportion in neuroimaging journals were guideline, validation study, and technical reports. Since the year 2000, multicenter study, review, and meta-analysis showed the strongest linear increase in annual publication count. These publication types also had the highest year-adjusted citation counts (4.7–10.0). Publication types with the lowest year-adjusted citation counts were editorial and case report (0.5–1.0). It was estimated that 12.5% of the publications labeled as case reports were incorrectly labeled. Conclusions: Neuroimaging literature has been expanding with papers of higher levels of evidence, such as meta-analyses, multicenter studies, and randomized controlled trials.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/282213
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.787
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, AWK-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T14:32:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-05T14:32:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, v. 14, p. article no. 136-
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/282213-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the bibliometric data of the most common publication types of the neuroimaging literature. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify all published papers with “neuroimaging” as their MeSH Major Topics, and they were further searched by the following publication types: case report, clinical trial, comparative study, editorial, evaluation study, guideline, meta-analysis, multicenter study, randomized controlled trial, review, technical report, and validation study. The proportion of papers belonging to each publication type published in neuroimaging journals was calculated. Year-adjusted mean citation counts for each publication type were computed using data from Web of Science. Publication trend and its correlation with citation performance were assessed. Results: Review and comparative study were the most common publication types. Publication types with the highest proportion in neuroimaging journals were guideline, validation study, and technical reports. Since the year 2000, multicenter study, review, and meta-analysis showed the strongest linear increase in annual publication count. These publication types also had the highest year-adjusted citation counts (4.7–10.0). Publication types with the lowest year-adjusted citation counts were editorial and case report (0.5–1.0). It was estimated that 12.5% of the publications labeled as case reports were incorrectly labeled. Conclusions: Neuroimaging literature has been expanding with papers of higher levels of evidence, such as meta-analyses, multicenter studies, and randomized controlled trials.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/humanneuroscience/-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Human Neuroscience-
dc.rightsThis Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectpublication type-
dc.subjectneuroimaging-
dc.subjectdiagnostics-
dc.subjectbibliometric-
dc.subjectcitation distribution-
dc.titleMost Common Publication Types of Neuroimaging Literature: Papers With High Levels of Evidence Are on the Rise-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, AWK: ndyeung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, AWK=rp02143-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2020.00136-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85085183014-
dc.identifier.hkuros309848-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 136-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 136-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000533390400001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-
dc.identifier.issnl1662-5161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats