File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Judicial diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: theory and evidence from the Singapore-initiated transnational judicial insolvency network

TitleJudicial diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: theory and evidence from the Singapore-initiated transnational judicial insolvency network
Authors
KeywordsJudicial insolvency network (JIN)
cross-border insolvency
judicial diplomacy
judicial recognition and assistance
private international law
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcls20/current
Citation
The Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2020, v. 20 n. 2, p. 389-420 How to Cite?
AbstractThe promulgation of the Judicial Insolvency Network (JIN) Guidelines by the Supreme Court of Singapore in 2017 has triggered innovative cross-border insolvency developments in the Asia-Pacific. It is intriguing that the Guidelines were conceived not by Singaporean judges alone, but jointly with a transnational network of bankruptcy judges. This article undertakes the original contribution of examining the Guidelines in light of the overall need for participating jurisdictions to craft a transnational insolvency framework. It uses Hong Kong as a test case to illustrate trends of likely future convergence.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280954
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.331
SSRN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, E-
dc.contributor.authorIp, EC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T07:43:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-25T07:43:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2020, v. 20 n. 2, p. 389-420-
dc.identifier.issn1473-5970-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280954-
dc.description.abstractThe promulgation of the Judicial Insolvency Network (JIN) Guidelines by the Supreme Court of Singapore in 2017 has triggered innovative cross-border insolvency developments in the Asia-Pacific. It is intriguing that the Guidelines were conceived not by Singaporean judges alone, but jointly with a transnational network of bankruptcy judges. This article undertakes the original contribution of examining the Guidelines in light of the overall need for participating jurisdictions to craft a transnational insolvency framework. It uses Hong Kong as a test case to illustrate trends of likely future convergence.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcls20/current-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Corporate Law Studies-
dc.subjectJudicial insolvency network (JIN)-
dc.subjectcross-border insolvency-
dc.subjectjudicial diplomacy-
dc.subjectjudicial recognition and assistance-
dc.subjectprivate international law-
dc.titleJudicial diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: theory and evidence from the Singapore-initiated transnational judicial insolvency network-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLee, E: eleelaw@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailIp, EC: ericcip@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLee, E=rp01257-
dc.identifier.authorityIp, EC=rp02161-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14735970.2019.1701174-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078637576-
dc.identifier.hkuros309247-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage389-
dc.identifier.epage420-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000506606900001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.ssrn4095507-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2022/21-
dc.identifier.issnl1473-5970-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats