File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Acculturation of rural–urban migrants in urbanising China: a multidimensional and bicultural framework

TitleAcculturation of rural–urban migrants in urbanising China: a multidimensional and bicultural framework
Authors
Keywordsacculturation
cultural distance
urbanisation
rural–urban migrants
China
internal migration
Issue Date2020
Citation
Population, Space and Place, 2020, v. 26, n. 1, article no. e2278 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. In many developing countries, including China, large numbers of internal migrants move to cities from rural areas in pursuit of an urban dream, but few studies have addressed acculturation of rural–urban migrants. We construct a multidimensional (in terms of components of acculturation such as practices, values, and identifications) and bicultural acculturation framework to understand adaptation by these migrants. Using data from a Guangzhou survey of rural–urban migrants in 2015–2016 and latent class analysis, four categories are identified, including two subtypes of integration and two subtypes of separation, which provide partial support for Berry's four-category acculturation model. The cultural distance hypothesis, that is, increasing cultural distance makes it more difficult for migrants to achieve integration, is partially confirmed at both individual and regional levels. These findings validate our theoretical framework for the pattern of acculturation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280716
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.630
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.398
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYue, Zhongshan-
dc.contributor.authorFong, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Shuzhuo-
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, Marcus W.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:45Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPopulation, Space and Place, 2020, v. 26, n. 1, article no. e2278-
dc.identifier.issn1544-8444-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280716-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. In many developing countries, including China, large numbers of internal migrants move to cities from rural areas in pursuit of an urban dream, but few studies have addressed acculturation of rural–urban migrants. We construct a multidimensional (in terms of components of acculturation such as practices, values, and identifications) and bicultural acculturation framework to understand adaptation by these migrants. Using data from a Guangzhou survey of rural–urban migrants in 2015–2016 and latent class analysis, four categories are identified, including two subtypes of integration and two subtypes of separation, which provide partial support for Berry's four-category acculturation model. The cultural distance hypothesis, that is, increasing cultural distance makes it more difficult for migrants to achieve integration, is partially confirmed at both individual and regional levels. These findings validate our theoretical framework for the pattern of acculturation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation, Space and Place-
dc.subjectacculturation-
dc.subjectcultural distance-
dc.subjecturbanisation-
dc.subjectrural–urban migrants-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectinternal migration-
dc.titleAcculturation of rural–urban migrants in urbanising China: a multidimensional and bicultural framework-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/psp.2278-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85075211379-
dc.identifier.hkuros319770-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e2278-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e2278-
dc.identifier.eissn1544-8452-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000496872200001-
dc.identifier.issnl1544-8444-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats