File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Variability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty

TitleVariability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.
Citation
Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) 38th Annual Congress, Hong Kong, 3-4 November 2018, p. 54 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: The optimal thickness of the cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed to be 3-5mm for implant stability. However, there is a paucity of studies on the capacity to obtain a constant cement mantle thickness in practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in the cement mantle thickness in TKA performed between different surgeons. Methodology: The 20 most recent primary TKA performed by each surgeon were selected to make up a total of 100 patients. There is varying cementing techniques between the surgeons. For all surgeons, pulsatile lavage and cement vacuum mixing was used. Some surgeons used a technique of finger packing to pressurise the intramedullary cavity before insertion of the implant. One surgeon did not use a tourniquet. Initial postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were assessed to measure the cement penetration according to zones proposed by the Knee Society. Results and Analysis: Between the surgeons, there were no difference in the cement thickness at the tibial tray (p>0.05), but there was a difference around the tibial stem (p<0.05). Particularly, a surgeon using a finger pressurisation technique produced a significantly thicker mantle around the stem (mean lateral 6.1mm; AP 5.1mm) compared to 2 other surgeons who didn’t use this technique (mean lateral 3.5mm, 3.6mm; AP: 3.6mm, 3.2mm). Discussion and Conclusion: Between the joint surgeons in our centre, there was no difference in cement thickness at the tibial tray, but there was a difference around the tibial stem, which may be affected by the cementing technique.
DescriptionFree Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. 1.10
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277831

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuk, MH-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PKY-
dc.contributor.authorChan, PK-
dc.contributor.authorFu, CHH-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, MHS-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, YLA-
dc.contributor.authorYan, CH-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:02:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:02:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) 38th Annual Congress, Hong Kong, 3-4 November 2018, p. 54-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277831-
dc.descriptionFree Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. 1.10-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The optimal thickness of the cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed to be 3-5mm for implant stability. However, there is a paucity of studies on the capacity to obtain a constant cement mantle thickness in practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in the cement mantle thickness in TKA performed between different surgeons. Methodology: The 20 most recent primary TKA performed by each surgeon were selected to make up a total of 100 patients. There is varying cementing techniques between the surgeons. For all surgeons, pulsatile lavage and cement vacuum mixing was used. Some surgeons used a technique of finger packing to pressurise the intramedullary cavity before insertion of the implant. One surgeon did not use a tourniquet. Initial postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were assessed to measure the cement penetration according to zones proposed by the Knee Society. Results and Analysis: Between the surgeons, there were no difference in the cement thickness at the tibial tray (p>0.05), but there was a difference around the tibial stem (p<0.05). Particularly, a surgeon using a finger pressurisation technique produced a significantly thicker mantle around the stem (mean lateral 6.1mm; AP 5.1mm) compared to 2 other surgeons who didn’t use this technique (mean lateral 3.5mm, 3.6mm; AP: 3.6mm, 3.2mm). Discussion and Conclusion: Between the joint surgeons in our centre, there was no difference in cement thickness at the tibial tray, but there was a difference around the tibial stem, which may be affected by the cementing technique.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.relation.ispartof38th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2018-
dc.rights38th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2018. Copyright © Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.titleVariability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLuk, MH: lukhilda@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PKY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, PK: cpk464@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFu, CHH: drhfu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, MHS: steveort@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, YLA: amyorth@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYan, CH: yanchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, PKY=rp00379-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, MHS=rp02253-
dc.identifier.authorityYan, CH=rp00303-
dc.identifier.hkuros307089-
dc.identifier.spage54-
dc.identifier.epage54-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats