File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Tightness of correlation inequalities with no quantum violation

TitleTightness of correlation inequalities with no quantum violation
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
Physical Review A, 2017, v. 95, n. 1, article no. 012139 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017 American Physical Society. We study the faces of the set of quantum correlations, i.e., the Bell and noncontextuality inequalities without any quantum violation. First, we investigate the question of whether every proper (facet-defining) Bell inequality for two parties, other than the trivial ones from positivity, normalization, and no-signaling, can be violated by quantum correlations, i.e., whether the classical Bell polytope or the smaller correlation polytope share any facets with their respective quantum sets. To do this, we develop a recently derived bound on the quantum value of linear games based on the norms of game matrices to give a simple sufficient condition to identify linear games with no quantum advantage. Additionally we show how this bound can be extended to the general class of unique games. We then show that the paradigmatic examples of correlation Bell inequalities with no quantum violation, namely the nonlocal computation games, do not constitute facet-defining Bell inequalities, not even for the correlation polytope. We also extend this to an arbitrary prime number of outcomes for a specific class of these games. We then study the faces in the simplest Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell scenario of binary dichotomic measurements, and identify edges in the set of quantum correlations in this scenario. Finally, we relate the noncontextual polytope of single-party correlation inequalities with the cut polytope CUT(G), where G denotes the compatibility graph of observables in the contextuality scenario and G denotes the suspension graph of G. We observe that there exist facet-defining noncontextuality inequalities with no quantum violation, and furthermore that this set of inequalities is beyond those implied by the consistent exclusivity principle.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277060
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 2.909

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan, Ravishankar-
dc.contributor.authorQuintino, Marco Túlio-
dc.contributor.authorSainz, Ana Belén-
dc.contributor.authorMurta, Gláucia-
dc.contributor.authorAugusiak, Remigiusz-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-18T08:35:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-18T08:35:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review A, 2017, v. 95, n. 1, article no. 012139-
dc.identifier.issn2469-9926-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277060-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 American Physical Society. We study the faces of the set of quantum correlations, i.e., the Bell and noncontextuality inequalities without any quantum violation. First, we investigate the question of whether every proper (facet-defining) Bell inequality for two parties, other than the trivial ones from positivity, normalization, and no-signaling, can be violated by quantum correlations, i.e., whether the classical Bell polytope or the smaller correlation polytope share any facets with their respective quantum sets. To do this, we develop a recently derived bound on the quantum value of linear games based on the norms of game matrices to give a simple sufficient condition to identify linear games with no quantum advantage. Additionally we show how this bound can be extended to the general class of unique games. We then show that the paradigmatic examples of correlation Bell inequalities with no quantum violation, namely the nonlocal computation games, do not constitute facet-defining Bell inequalities, not even for the correlation polytope. We also extend this to an arbitrary prime number of outcomes for a specific class of these games. We then study the faces in the simplest Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell scenario of binary dichotomic measurements, and identify edges in the set of quantum correlations in this scenario. Finally, we relate the noncontextual polytope of single-party correlation inequalities with the cut polytope CUT(G), where G denotes the compatibility graph of observables in the contextuality scenario and G denotes the suspension graph of G. We observe that there exist facet-defining noncontextuality inequalities with no quantum violation, and furthermore that this set of inequalities is beyond those implied by the consistent exclusivity principle.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Review A-
dc.titleTightness of correlation inequalities with no quantum violation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012139-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85011649851-
dc.identifier.volume95-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 012139-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 012139-
dc.identifier.eissn2469-9934-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats